Karnataka

Mandya

CC/08/67

Sri.Shankarlingegowda B.N. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Guru Teack Investments (Mysore) Pvt. Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

27 Aug 2008

ORDER


DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANDYA
No.2083/1, Subhash Nagar, 1st Cross, Mandya-571401
consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/67

Sri.Shankarlingegowda B.N.		 ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Guru Teack Investments (Mysore) Pvt. Ltd., 		...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma2. Sri.M.N.Manohara3. Sri.Siddegowda

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Complainant is present, Opposite party present, files memo with policy copy. So, orally objection if IA-I. IA-I is permitted. Sri.S.M.submit that he is ready to settle claim as per bond. Complainants consent for the same. Since 8% p.a. interest is mentioned in the bond, the complainant is entitled to undertaking Rs.3,370/- upto date of complaint. It is deemed to pay Rs.3,370/- interest and cost of Rs.500/- as Opposite party has deposited the claimed amount of Rs.10,650/-. Sri.S.M. pay Rs.3,900/- to complainant in full settlment of the claim and complainant received Rs.3,900/- office is directed to pay the deposited amount. complaint is closed as settled.




......................Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma
......................Sri.M.N.Manohara
......................Sri.Siddegowda