Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1677/08

DR.V.RAVINDER REDDY - Complainant(s)

Versus

GUNDA YAKAIAH - Opp.Party(s)

M/S N.GOWRISHANER C/O M/S DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE AND ASSO.

18 Mar 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1677/08
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)
 
1. DR.V.RAVINDER REDDY
MAMATA NARSING HOME, WARDHANNAPET, OF WARANGAL DIST.
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. GUNDA YAKAIAH
R/O KATREPALLI VILLAGE, RAYAPARTHY MANDAL OF WARANGAL DIST.
Andhra Pradesh
2. GUDA MALLESH, MINOR
SAME ADDRESS
3. GUNDA AMBICA, MINOR
R/O KATREPALLI VILLAGE, RAYAPARTHY MANDAL OF WARANGAL DIST.
WARANGAL
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MR. SYED ABDULLAH Member
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ATHYDERABAD

 

F.A.No.1677 OF 2008 AGAINST C.D.No.150 OF 1997 DISTRICT FORUMWARANGAL

Between:
Dr.V.Ravinder Reddy, MBBS.,
Mamata Nursing Home

                                                               

       

 

Gunda Upendramma W/o Yakaiah
age: 25 years, Occ: Labour
R/o Katrepalli (V) Raiparthy (M)
Warangal District

                                                               

1.           

2.           

3.                  

                                                                                                                      

Counsel for the Appellant            

Counsel for the Respondents       

 

QUORUM:  HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO, PRESIDENT  

 SRI SYED ABDULLAH, HON’BLE MEMBER.

                                               SRI R.LAKSHMINARSIMHA RAO 

 

FRIDAY THE EIGTHEENTH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND ELEVAN

 

Oral Order  

                

1.    

2.     st  of blood from the brothers and sisters of the patient.   CKMHospital,Warangal. CKMHospital  RohiniHospital Govt.MaternityHospital  

3.     Govt.MaternityHospital, Hanamkonda advised the respondent no.1 to get the blood of the sister of the patient and after testing the blood group of the sister of the patient it was found ‘B’ positive whereas the blood group of his wife was ‘B’ negative.   

4.     stMaternityHospitalWarangal  

5.       

6.    GovernmentMaternityHospital 

7.    `15,000/- each to the respondents no.2 and 3 with interest @ 7.5% thereof. 

8.    

9.    Feeling aggrieved by the order of the District Forum, the appellant has filed the appeal contending that he is an experienced doctor and that the District Forum failed to see the possibility of the patient living when unmatched group of blood was transfused and that the sterilization certificate might have been issued under coercion.

10.   

 

1.   Whether the appellant had not performed operation upon the wife of the respondent no.1?

2.   Whether the appellant had transfused unmatched blood group blood to the deceased wife of the respondent no.1?

3.   To what relief?

11.   

12.      GovernmentMaternityHospital 

13.       She has stated that even after transfusion of the blood her sister was bleeding.  14.       

15.    Warangal.    

16.      

17.       

18.   `20,000/- to the respondent no.1 and`15,000/- each to the respondents no.2 and 3 along with interest 7.5% per annum thereon. Govt.MaternityHospital    

19.     `15,000/- each to the respondents no.2 and 3.  

 

 

                                                                            

                                                                            

                                                                                                                                               

KMK*                                                               

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
[HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MR. SYED ABDULLAH]
Member
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.