Haryana

Karnal

CC/374/2022

Yogik Dhingra - Complainant(s)

Versus

GT-Force Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Tarun Sharma

23 Feb 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.374 of 2022

                                                          Date of instt.05.07.2022

                                                          Date of Decision:23.02.2024

 

Yogik Dhingra son of Sh. Mukesh, resident of House No.12, Jawahar Nagar, Bank Colony, Mall road, Karnal.

          ...…Complainant

                                        Versus

1. GT-Force Company Ltd., Corporate Office & manufacturing facility Plot no.320-321, Sector-8, IMT Manesar, Gurugram-122051, through its director/authorized representative.
2. E-Ride Karnal India Motors, situated at clock tower, chowk, Karnal thorugh its partner/proprietor/authorized signatory.

 

                        ....Opposite parties.

                                             

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Dr. Suman Singh………….Member.

               

Present:  None for the complainant.

                         

                Today the case is fixed for notice to the OPs. Notice could not be issued for want of correct address. None has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. The present complaint pertains to years 2022 and same is still at the stage of preliminary hearing, i.e. notice to the OPs. Complainant has failed to file the correct address since filing the complaint. Repeatedly the case has been adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the complainant. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 03:30 PM. No wait is justified. It appears that complainant is no more interested to pursue his case. There is no justification to adjourn the case further for the same purpose.

                Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:23.02.2024             

                          President,

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Suman Singh) 

  Member                    Member