Delhi

South West

CC/56/2022

M/S LIVE DIGITAL MARKETING SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED - Complainant(s)

Versus

GS GRAPHICS - Opp.Party(s)

ABHAY KAUSHIK

08 May 2023

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/56/2022
( Date of Filing : 18 Dec 2021 )
 
1. M/S LIVE DIGITAL MARKETING SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
33-B, BER SARAI, NEAR JNU
SOUTH
DELHI
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. GS GRAPHICS
249, E G/F, RAMA MARKET
SOUTH WEST
DELHI
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SH,SURESH KUMAR GUPTA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. HARSHALI KAUR MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. RAMESH CHAND YADAV MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
None
......for the Complainant
 
None
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 08 May 2023
Final Order / Judgement

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-VII

DISTRICT: SOUTH-WEST

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI

FIRST FLOOR, PANDIT DEEP CHAND SHARMA SAHKAR BHAWAN

SECTOR-20, DWARKA, NEW DELHI-110077

                  CASE NO. CC/56/22

Date of Institution:-28.02.2022

Order reserved on:-31.03.2023

Date of Decision:-08.05.2023

IN THE MATTER OF:

Ms/ Livedigital Marketing

Solutions Private Limited

Having Registered Office at:

33-B, Ber Sarai, Near JNU,

New Delhi – 110016, India.

 

Also At:

3rd Floor, D-5, Logix Infotech Park,

 Sector-59, Noida, U.P., India                                     ......Complainant

VERSUS

  1.           GS Graphics

Having Office at:

249 E G/F, Rama Market,

New Delhi – 110067, India..…..Opposite parties

 

O R D E R

 

Per R. C. Yadav, Member

 

  1. The complainant, M/s Livedigital Marketing Solutions Private Limited is a company duly incorporated under provision of the Company Act and inter alia indulged in the business of business process out sourcing. The OP is a vendor from whom the complainant had purchased webcam on 24.10.2021 and 25.10.2021 vide invoice no.084 and 085 at the rate of 1250 per piece with 18% GST charges. The copy of the same invoice is also attached. The complainant has purchased 12 pieces of webcam from OP. During audit process, the complainant came to know the maximum retail price in Max Retail Price of the purchased products is Rs.1199/- per piece including all taxes. The colour photocopy of the real MRP of the web cam is also attached. The complainant was shocked to know that on line price of webcam on Amazon was Rs.580/- per piece for the same product. The web cam was purchased for the safety and to check day to day activities for the office. The OP has overcharged the price for the same product as against Max Retail Price on the product.

 

  1. The OP was served but did not enter appearance. He was proceeded ex-parte vide order dated 08.07.2022.

 

  1. The complainant has filed Ex-parte evidence by way of affidavit in support of his case.

 

  1. We have gone through the material on record carefully and thoroughly.

 

  1. We have heard the complainant who submitted that matter may be disposed of on the basis of material on record.

 

  1. The case of the complainant that M/s Livedigital Marketing Solutions Private Limited is a company duly incorporated under provision of the Company Act and inter alia indulged in the business of business process out sourcing. The OP is a vendor from whom the complainant had purchased webcam on 24.10.2021 and 25.10.2021 vide invoice no.084 and 085 at the rate of 1250 per piece with 18% GST charges. The copy of the same invoice is also attached. The complainant has purchased 12 pieces of webcam from OP. During audit process, the complainant came to know the maximum retail price in Max Retail Price of the purchased products is Rs.1199/- per piece including all taxes. The colour photocopy of the real Max Retail Price of the web cam is also attached. The complainant was shocked to know that on line price of webcam on Amazon was Rs.580/- per piece for the same product. The web cam was purchased for the safety and to check day to day activities for the office. The OP has overcharged the price for the same product as against Max Retail Price on the product. The allegations made by the complainant have gone unchallenged and unrebutted. It is clear that OP has charged excess money against Max Retail Price, which clearly and apparently constitutes deficiency-in-service and unfair trade practice on the part of the OP.

 

  1.  Accordingly, we allow the complaint and direct OP to refund Rs.732/- as excess charged against for the web cam and Rs.8,000/- lump sum for mental agony, harassment and litigation charges.

 

  • Order be given dasti to both parties.
  • The file be consigned to record room thereafter.
  • Order pronounced on 08.05.2023.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SH,SURESH KUMAR GUPTA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MS. HARSHALI KAUR]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. RAMESH CHAND YADAV]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.