Kerala

Malappuram

CC/144/2022

MUHAMMED SHAREEF K - Complainant(s)

Versus

GRISHMA PATEL - Opp.Party(s)

30 Jun 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
MALAPPURAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/144/2022
( Date of Filing : 23 Apr 2022 )
 
1. MUHAMMED SHAREEF K
POOLAMPARAMBA HOUSE KARIPUR PALLIKKAL KUMMINIPARAMBA 673638
2. ALI T
KARIPPATHODI HOUSE KARIPUR KUMMINIPARAMBA POST 673638
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. GRISHMA PATEL
SALES MANAGER RAJESH MACHINES LLP PLOT NO 7 DHEBAR ROAD SOUTH ALIKA INDUSTRIAL AREA RAJKOT GUJARAT 360062
2. MANAGING PARTNER
RAJESH MACHINES LLP PLOT NO7 DHEBAR ROAD SOUTH ALIKA INDUSTRIAL AREA RAJKOT GUJARAT 360062
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. MOHANDASAN K PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. MOHAMED ISMAYIL CV MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. PREETHI SIVARAMAN C MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 30 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

By Smt. PREETHI SIVARAMAN.C, MEMBER

 

1. The complaint   in short is as follows:-

          Complainants are running a partnership firm in the name and style of M/s Grand Engineering for their livelihood and first complainant is the managing partner and second complainant is the partner of the firm. They are the manufacturers of iron door frames and window frames using different types of galvanised iron sheets.     

2.       First opposite party offered two machines for making iron door frame and window frame using different types of galvanised iron sheets. The machines are comprising of  bending machine   in which  iron sheets can be  bend at 90degree angle and cutting machine to cut iron frames. First opposite party offered and assured that all types of iron sheets can be bend at  900 angle and cut the iron sheets for manufacturing iron door frames and window frames.

3.     By believing the words of first opposite party  ,complainant ordered and purchased the machine   from opposite  parties and  complainants paid an amount of Rs.12,15,636/-, the cost of machine as per  invoice No.515 to opposite parties. The opposite parties had generated an e-way bill in favour of M/s Grand Engineering Kerala  to complainant for the above transaction and  complainants paid Rs. 70,050/- to opposite parties for  transporting the machine from Gujarat to  complainants  place. The machine was installed by the opposite parties, but while using the machine it has not been working properly. After one month of its purchase, complainants were not able to use the machine for a single use.  It is a manufacturing defect of the machine. The iron sheets are not bend in the   900 angle. 

4.      The machine is not working properly and there occurred wastage of iron sheets and complainants incurred heavy loss due to that. They are paying rent for the building as per rent agreement and as on now they paid Rs. 75,000/- as rent. More over they had purchased galvanized iron sheets for an amount of Rs. 70,001/- and   HR sheet TATA 10mm for an amount of Rs. 40,002/- .The whole sheet has been lost due to the non bending of the iron sheets by the machine at  900.  They again stated that they had incurred a loss of Rs. 2,00,000/- as labour charge. They also contented that there occurred a loss of Rs. 6,010/- as electricity bill. Moreover they have paid an amount of Rs. 10,000/- as service charge of engineer and they had purchased Altech Hyd Aw Golden 68 – 210 litres lubricants and hydraulic oil    for an amount of Rs. 42,000/- for the working of machine.  The act of the opposite parties amount to deficiency in service and unfair trade practice. Opposite parties supplied machine having manufacturing defect. The act of opposite parties is a clear deficiency in service and unfair trade practice from the side of opposite parties which caused mental agony , monitoring loss and suffering to  complainants. Hence this complaint.

5.    The prayer of the complainants  are that , they are   entitled to get a full refund

of Rs. 12,15,636/-the cost of the machines and they also entitled to get Rs. 70,050/- as the transportation charge paid by them with 12% interest, Rs. 75,000/- towards rent , Rs. 1,10,003/- the cost of iron sheets, Rs. 2,00,000/-  towards labour charge, Rs. 6,010/- towards electricity charge, Rs. 10,000/- towards charge of service engineer Rs. 42,000/- towards charge of hydraulic  oil Rs. 25,00,000/- as compensation on account of deficiency in service  and unfair trade practice on the part of opposite parties and thereby caused mental agony, physical hardships and sufferings to the complainants and Rs. 25,000/- as cost of the proceedings. 

6.      On admission of the complaint notice was issued to the opposite parties and notice served on them and they  did not turn up. Hence opposite parties set exparte.

7.       In order to substantiate the case of the complainant, he filed an affidavit in lieu of Chief examination and the documents he produced were marked as Ext. A1 to A7. Ext.A1 is the true copy of the tax invoice for an amount of Rs. 12,15,636/- issued from M/s Rajesh machines  dated 04/03/2021.  Ext.A2 is the true copy of money receipt issued by Janvi Logistics for transportation charge of Rs. 70,050/- dated 08/03/2021. Ext. A3 is the true copy of e-way bill dated 14/03/2021, Ext. A4 is the true copy of the GST invoice issued by KM Steels for iron sheets worth Rs. 70,001/- dated 10/04/2021, Ext. A5 is the true copy of GST invoice issued by KM Steels for iron sheets worth Rs. 40,002/- dated 12/04/2021. Ext. A6 is the true copy of GST invoice  issued by  Global Lubricants  for hydraulic oil worth Rs. 42,000/- dated 17/03/2021. Ext. A7 is the true copy GST registration certificate dated 07/01/2021. 

8.     Heard the complainants and perused the affidavit and documents filed by complainants. The allegations against opposite parties are proved by the unchallenged evidence of complainants. There is no contra evidence in this matter.   Moreover complainants submitted seven documents which are very supportive to prove their case.  But complainants did not produce the details of rent agreement and details of monthly rent, documents regarding labour charge, electricity bills, bill for charge of service engineer etc. Hence we are unable to give that amounts to complainants. Hence the Commission finds that there is deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties as alleged in the complaint. Hence we allow this complaint holding that opposite parties are deficient in service.

9.   We allow this complaint as follows:-

  1. The opposite parties are directed to refund Rs.12,15,636/-(Rupees Twelve lakh  fifteen thousand  six hundred and thirty six  only)  cost of the machines  to the complainants and complainants are  directed to return the  damaged machines  to opposite parties  after  payment made by them and opposite parties are  directed to take the machine from the premises of complainants. .
  2. The opposite parties are directed to pay Rs.2,00,000/-(Rupees Two lakh only)  to complainants  which they  already had spent  for  transporting the  machines from Gujarat to Karipur, for galvanised iron sheets, HR Sheets TATA and  for Lubricants .
  3. The opposite parties are directed to pay compensation of Rs. 50,000/-(Rupees Fifty thousand only)  to  the complainants on account of deficiency in service on the part of opposite parties and thereby caused mental agony, physical hardships and sufferings to the complainants.
  4. The opposite parties also directed to pay Rs.5000/-(Rupees Five thousand only)  as cost of the proceedings.

           If the above said amount is not paid to the complainants within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the opposite parties are  liable to pay the interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the said amount from the date of receipt of the copy of this order till realisation.

 

Dated this 30th day of June, 2023.

 

 

MOHANDASAN K., PRESIDENT

 

PREETHI SIVARAMAN C., MEMBER

 

MOHAMED ISMAYIL C.V., MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX

 

Witness examined on the side of the complainant                            : Nil

Documents marked on the side of the complainant                          : Ext.A1to A7

Ext.A1 : True  copy of  the tax invoice  for an amount of  Rs. 12,15,636/- issued from

              M/s Rajesh machines  dated 04/03/2021. 

Ext.A2 : True copy of  money receipt issued by  Janvi Logistics  for transportation

               charge of Rs. 70,050/- dated 08/03/2021.

Ext. A3 : True copy of e-way bill  dated 14/03/2021.

Ext.A4 : True copy of the GST invoice issued by KM Steels  for iron sheets  worth RS.

              70,001/- dated 10/04/2021,

Ext.A5: True copy of GST invoice issued by KM Steels for iron sheets worth Rs.

              40,002/- dated 12/04/2021.

Ext.A6 : True copy of GST invoice  issued by  Global Lubricants  for hydraulic oil worth

                Rs. 42,000/- dated 17/03/2021.

Ext. A7 : True copy  GST registration certificate  dated 07/01/2021. 

Witness examined on the side of the opposite party                       : Nil

Documents marked on the side of the opposite party                    : Nil

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. MOHANDASAN K]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. MOHAMED ISMAYIL CV]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PREETHI SIVARAMAN C]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.