Kerala

Kottayam

CC/168/2020

Radhakrishnan Nair T R - Complainant(s)

Versus

Grigorial Institite of Technology(GIT) - Opp.Party(s)

17 Mar 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/168/2020
( Date of Filing : 21 Oct 2020 )
 
1. Radhakrishnan Nair T R
Thakidiyel House, Kavumbhagam P O cheruvalli Village, Kottayam.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Grigorial Institite of Technology(GIT)
Chairman, Grigorial Institute of Techlogy(GIT) Grigorial Nagar, Kanjirappara P O Kangazha Kottayam-686555
Kottayam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 17 Mar 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated this the 17th day of March, 2022

 

Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President

           Smt. Bindhu R.  Member           

           Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

 

C C No.168/2020 (filed on 21-10-2020)

 

Petitioner                                 :    Radhakrishnan Nair T.R.,

                                                     S/o Ramakrishnan Nair,

                                                     Thakadiyel House,

                                                     Kavumbhagom P.O., Cheruvally Village,

                                                     Kottayam District – 686 519.
                                                         

                                                          Vs.                                          

Opposite party                        :  The Chairman,

                                                   Gregorian Institute of Technology (GIT),

                                                   Gregorian Nagar,  Kanjirappara P.O.,

                                                   Kangara, Kottayam – 686 555.

   

                                                          O  R  D  E  R

Sri. Manulal V.S. President

             Complainant absent.  No representation.  Opposite party absent. No representation.  On verification of documents we can seen that the complainant filed a memo stating that the matter is amicably settled between the parties. Hence the complaint is disposed as withdrawn as settled.    

                     

   Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 17th day of March, 2022

         

Sri. Manulal V.S. President   Sd/-

Smt. Bindhu R.  Member      Sd/-

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member        Sd/-    

                                                                                 By Order 

 

                                                                       Assistant Registrar                                                                                    

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.