Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/284/2017

Vaikuntam Niketh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Green Habits Private Limited, - Opp.Party(s)

K. Aparna Devi

05 Oct 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

                    BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                                             Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

C.C. No.284/2017                                                          

                                                   DATED THE 05^TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021

 

1. Vaikuntam Niketh,

S/o. Mr. R. Vaikuntam,

 

2. Anuradha Niketh,

W/o. Mr. Vaikuntam Niketh,

Both residing at:-

No.D-127A, Rajammar Salai,

K.K. Nagar,

Chennai – 600 078.                                                                                 .. Complainants.

 

-Versus-

 

1. GREEN HABITS PRIVATE LIMITED,

Represented by its Director,

Sigma 6^th Floor,

Technology Street,

Hiranandani Business Park,

Powai,

Mumbai – 400 076.

 

2. EVITA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.,

Represented by its Director

Mr. Kamal Niranjan Hiranandani,

Olympia Central Avenue,

 Hiranandani Business Park,

Powai,

Mumbai – 400 076.

 

3. HIRANANDANI COMMUNITIES,

Represented by its Director

Mr. Kamal Niranjan Hiranandani,

Alpha Building,

11^th Floor, Main Street,

Hiranandani Gardens,

Powai,

Mumbai – 400 076.                                                                           .. Opposite Parties.

 

Counsel for the complainants             : M/s. K. Aparna & Devi

Counsel for the 1^st opposite party       : M/s. Govind Chandrasekar

Counsel for the 2^nd opposite party      : M/s. K.B. Gopi

Counsel for the 3^rd opposite party      : M/s. S. Vijaya Kumar

 

          This consumer complaint coming up before us on 05.10.2021 for filing proof affidavit of opposite parties 1 & 3 and for appropriate orders this Commission made the following:-

                                            

 

Docket order

 

            Both present.  Memo filed by the complainant seeking permission to withdraw the complaint.   Memo recorded.

            In view of the Memo, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.   No order as to cost.

 

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                                     Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                              R.SUBBIAH                        

            MEMBER                                                                                                 PRESIDENT