Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/261/2017

Somasundaram Balu - Complainant(s)

Versus

Green Avenue Homes&Gardens Represented by its proprietor and Managing Director & other - Opp.Party(s)

S.K.Srinivasan-Compt.

31 Aug 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/261/2017
( Date of Filing : 28 Nov 2017 )
 
1. Somasundaram Balu
Plot No.39,First Main Road, Nagappa Nager, Chrompet, Chennai-600044
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Green Avenue Homes&Gardens Represented by its proprietor and Managing Director & other
Dhakshin Avenue Unamancheri Village ch-127
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 31 Aug 2021
Final Order / Judgement

                      STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                     BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                         Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                         ::      MEMBER

 

CC. No. 261/2017

                                                          DATED THIS THE 31ST  DAY OF AUGUST 2021

 

Mr.Somasundaram Balu,

Son of S.Balu and

2.Mrs. Bhavani Venkatraman,

Wife of Mr.Somasundaram Balu,

Both residing at 24, Les Buissonnets sweetmans Avenue,

Blackrock Co.Dublin Ireland,

Both represented by their General Power of Attorney holder,

R.Venkataraman, Son of Ramaseshan, 

Plot No.39, First Main Road,

Nagappa Nagar, Chrompet, Chennai 600 044               ..Complainants 1 & 2

 

                                       Vs

 

1.Green Avenue Homes and Gardens

Represented by its

Proprietor and Managing Director,

D.Dhinakaran

Dhakshin Avenue – III/IV,

Unamancheri village,

Chennai – 600 127                   

 

2. Artha Real Estate Corporation Limited

Formerly Bennett property Holdings Company Limited,

Artha properties, represented by its

Chief Executive officer

Mr.Suresh Rangarajan,

No.41, Vandalur Kelambakkam Main Road,

Pudupakkam, Chennai – 600 103                                ..opposite parties

 

Counsel for complainants 1 and 2         : M/s S.K.Srinivasan

1st opposite party                                : PP Effected  called absent

Counsel for 2nd opposite party               : M/s Tatva Legal

 

          This complaint coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                                                 Docket order

          Learned counsel for complainants present. When the matter is taken up today for consideration, the learned counsel for complainants filed a memo praying for withdrawal of the complainant since the matter was settled out of court. Memo recorded.

          In view of the memo, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to cost.

          Registry shall return the original power of Attorney by substituting a copy of power of Attorney by the complainant.         

    Sd/-                                                                                                                  Sd/-

S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                                                         R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                               PRESIDENT

 

                                                                                                             

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.