Punjab

StateCommission

CC/75/2017

Saurabh Goswami - Complainant(s)

Versus

Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) - Opp.Party(s)

Megha Chauhan

17 Mar 2017

ORDER

                                                                       2^nd Additional Bench

PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH

Misc. Application Nos.440 & 565 of 2017

                                      In/and

                                                                      Consumer Complaint No.75 of 2017

           

                                                          Date of institution:  07.02.2017

                                                          Date of decision   :  17.03.2017

                                                                    

Saurabh Goswami, S/o Sh. Ravinder Goswami, R/o 259, Sector 16, Panchkula, Haryana-134109.

                                                                                                …..Complainant

Versus

Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) through its Chief Administrator, PUDA Bhawan, Sector 62, SAS Nagar, Mohali-160062.

     …Opposite Party

Complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

Before:-

          Hon’ble Mr. Justice Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal, President

                         Mr. Harcharan Singh Guram, Member

Present:-

          For the complainant    :     Ms. Megha Chauhan, Advocate

 

JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL, PRESIDENT

 

                                      Order

 Misc. Application No.565 of 2017 (amendment)

                    The consumer complaint has been filed for the direction to the OP to pay interest on the delayed amounts etc. After filing of the complaint an application for amendment has been filed, whereby number of paragraphs in the complaint are sought to be amended. It will virtually be re-writing a new complaint.

          Accordingly, we dismiss this application.

Main Case

          Since we have dismissed the application for amendment and the complainant intends to make major amendments in the complaint, the present complaint is dismissed with liberty to file a complete and comprehensive complaint, as the complainant may deem  fit on the same cause of action.

          Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed with aforesaid liberty.

          The complainant will be at liberty to incorporate any other facts which may be necessary in the relief claimed in the said complaint.

 

 

                                                         

(JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL)

                                                                       PRESIDENT

 

 

                                                          (HARCHARAN SINGH GURAM)

                                                                         MEMBER

 

March 17, 2017

PK/-