FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCH
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR -37 A, CHANDIGARH
Execution Application No.192 of 2017
In
Consumer Complaint No.254 of 2016
Date of Institution : 29.11.2017
Date of Decision : 25.10.2018
Balwinder Kumar Bhola aged about 52 years S/o Sh. O.P. Bhola R/o Kothi No.2389, Sector 71, Mohali
……..Applicant/complainant
Versus
1. Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, PUDA Bhawan, Sector-62, SAS Nagar (Mohali), Punjab – 160062.
2. The Chief Administrator, Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, PUDA Bhawan, Sector-62, SAS Nagar (Mohali) Punjab – 160062.
3. Estate Officer (H) Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, PUDA Bhawan, Sector-62, SAS Nagar (Mohali) Punjab – 160062.
……Opposite parties/Judgment Debtors
Execution application under Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Sh. J.S. Klar, Presiding Judicial Member
Smt. Kiran Sibal, Member
Present:-
For the DH/complainant : Sh. Naveen Kumar, Advocate with
Sh. B.K. Bhola, in person
For JDs : Sh. G.S. Arshi, Advocate with
Sh. Mahesh Bansal, Estate Officer
J.S. KLAR, PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
The matter has been settled between the parties. Sh. Mahesh Bansal, Estate Officer of JDs has made the statement, stating that the project has been completed and the flat is ready for occupation to the allottee. He tendered on record completion certificate Ex.JD-1 and copy of order of this Commission passed in Group Captian Bhupinder Singh Vs. GMADA in Execution Application No.79 of 2016 as Ex.JD-2. In view of statement of Sh. Mahesh Bansal, Estate Officer of JDs and statement of DH with his counsel, the execution application is disposed of and DH is directed to pay the balance amount, if any of sale amount, to JDs on or before 10.11.2018 other than interest amount which part has been stayed by Hon’ble National Commission in it order in appeal. On receiving the balance sale amount from DH, if any, JDs shall deliver the possession of the allotted flat to DH at 11:00AM on 15.11.2018 on the spot in a completed form.
2. The Execution Application is disposed of. However, it is made clear that in case, of noncompliance of this order, DH will be at liberty to file the fresh execution application for implementation of the order.
(J.S. KLAR)
Presiding Judicial Member
(KIRAN SIBAL)
Member
October 25, 2018
DB