Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/341/2012

Miss Sumati Jaitley - Complainant(s)

Versus

Government Medical College and Hospital Sector 32 - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Manu Loona, Adv.

30 Jul 2012

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 341 of 2012
1. Miss Sumati JaitleyShop No. 6 GMCH, Sector 32, UT, Chandigarh D/o Sh.N.K. Jaitley R/o H.No. 2200, Sector 21, UT, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Government Medical College and Hospital Sector 32through its D i Director Principal ii Additional Director iii Superintendent (Estate Branch) iv. Assistant Controller (F & A-1) Branch2. UT Chandigarh through its i Executive Engineer P & H division No. 1, Sector 9 UT Chandigarh i Executive Engineer C.P. Division No. 5, Sec 9UT Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Mr. Manu Loona, Adv., Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 30 Jul 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Consumer Complaint No. 341 of 2012

 

 

Sumati Jaitly          Vs.     Government Medical College and Hospital

 

PRESENT:

 

Sh.Manu Loona, Counsel for Complainant.

 

Dated the 30th day of July, 2012

 

ORDER

 

           

            Amended memo of parties filed.

            Counsel for complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“Due to technical defect, I do not press this complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant reserves her right to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the technical defect”

 

            In view of statement made by counsel for complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the technical defect, as per law.

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the complainant free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

 

            Sd/-                                          Sd/-                                          Sd/-

(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)       (LAKSHMAN SHARMA)           (MADHU MUTNEJA)

            MEMBER                                  PRESIDENT                                MEMBER



MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER