Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/1602/2009

Miss Komal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Goswami Ganesh Dutta Sanatan Dharma College - Opp.Party(s)

20 Apr 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM - I Plot No 5- B, Sector 19 B, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh - 160 019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 1602 of 2009
1. Miss KomalD/o Sh. R.K.Pathak House No. 612a, SEctor-31/A Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Goswami Ganesh Dutta Sanatan Dharma CollegeChandigarh(SDCC) SEctor-32 Chandigarh thourhg its Principal2. Panjab Univbersity Adfministrative Block Sector-14Chandigarh through its Registrar ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 20 Apr 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I

U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

                                                                                     

Complaint Case No. 1602 of 2009

 

1.         Miss Komal d/o Sh.R.K.Pathak, House No.612a, Sector 31A, Chandigarh.

2.         Sh.Rajesh Kumar Pathak s/o Sh.R.S.Pathak, House No.612a, Sector 31-A, Chandigarh.                                                                             … Complainant

 

                                                Versus

1.         Goswami Ganesh Dutta Sanatan Dharma College, Chandigarh (SDCC), Sector 32, Chandigarh through its Principal.

2.         Panjab University, Administrative Block, Sector 14, Chandigarh through its Registrar.

 

Present:         Sh.Rajesh Kumar Pathak, Complainant No.2 in person alongwith Sh.Krishan Singla, Advocate for Complainants.

Sh.Rohit Dheer, Advocate for OP No.1.

                        Dr.Ranbir Kaur, Representative of OP No.2.                                          

                                                            ORDER

 

                        Sh.Rajesh Kumar Pathak, complainant No.2 in person alongwith counsel Sh.Krishan Singla, Advocate for complainants has made statement for withdrawal of the complaint as the complainants have no grievance against OPs. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.

                        Certified copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

20.04.2010                        (RAJINDER SINGH GILL)                                (ASHOK RAJ BHANDARI)

                                    MEMBER                                             PRESIDING MEMBER             



, NONE RAJINDER SINGH GILL, PRESIDING MEMBER ,