A. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : ATHYDERABAD

FA   

Between:

Gokul Institute of Technology and Sciences

Rep. by its Principal

Piridi, Bobbili Mandal,

Vizianagaram

Vizianagaram District                           

And

Gorle MuraliKrishna, S/o Satyanarayana,

Hindu, aged 21 yrs, Anthakapalli Village,

Sabbavaram Mandal,

Visakhapatnam District.                        

Counsel for the Appellant 

Counsel for the Respondent 

Coram                                  

And

Tuesday, the Twenty Third Day of April

Two Thousand Thirteen

****

2.           The brief facts of the complaint are that                the complaint to direct the OP  compensation of Rs.16,00,000/-

3.          

Complainant having admittedly secured less than 65% of attendance, became ineligible to attend the examinations conducted by JNTU and hence he himself is responsible for the loss of the academic year by failing to secure even the minimum percentage of attendance, and  bound to pay  

.

6.            

7.               

8.    

There is no dispute that the complainant took admission in B.Tech course in CSE stream in the OP.1’s college and that in all he paid Rs.1,27,000/-.  such question of refund of fee does not arise. The complainant contends that the Attendance Registers etc are manipulated to deprive the complainant from appearing from the examination. Absolutely, OP had no reasons to deprive a student in such a way.  

9.