Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/241/2013

THE SPECIAL OFFICER - Complainant(s)

Versus

GOPAL - Opp.Party(s)

K. PREMKUMAR

29 Nov 2021

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                                PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                               MEMBER

F.A. No.241/2013

(Against the order in C.C. No.14/2009, dated:28.03.2011 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Namakkal)

                                                                 DATED THE 29^th  DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

1.The Special Officer,

   Mohaur S.No.1505, Mohanur Cooperative Building

   Society Ltd., Mohanur post – 637 015.

   Nmakka Taluk & District.

 

2.The Secretary,

   Mohanur S.No.1505, Mohanur Cooperative Building

   Society Ltd., Mohanur Post-637 015.                                                              .. Appellants / Opposite parties 1 & 2

 

-Vs-

1.Gopal (Secretary)

   S.298, S.Manappalli PACB,

   S.Manappalli,

   Paramthi Velur Taluk,

   Namakkal District.                                                                                     .. Respondent/ Complainant

 

2.The Deputy Registrar (Housing)

   Deputy Registrar Office of

   East Garden, Fairlands,

   Salem -16.                                                                                              .. 2^nd Respondents/3^rd Opp. Party

 

Counsel for the Appellants                           : M/s. K.Premkumar

Counsel for the 1^st Respondent                    : M/s. N.Thiyagarajan

Respondent 2                                                : Sd called absent

          This appeal coming up before us on 29.11.2021 and this Commission made the following order in open court:                                                                                                

Docket order

            No representation for  both.  This appeal is posted today for appearance & for reporting compliance  & for arguments in list. When the matter was called at 10.30 a.m the parties were not present  hence,  passed over and  called again at 12.30 pm, then also the parties  have not appeared. Hence keeping the appeal  pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

            Hence the appeal  is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                                       Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                               PRESIDENT