Date of filing:      16.10.2018
                                                                                                                   Date of disposal: 29.11.2022

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVALLUR

 BEFORE  TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L, Ph.D (Law)                  .…. PRESIDENT
                 THIRU.P.MURUGAN,M.Com.ICWA(Inter),B.L.,                                       ....MEMBER-II

RBT/CC. No.50/2022
THIS TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022
(CC.No.24/2019 sent from DCDRC, Chennai North)

Dr.V.G.Shobana,
D/o.MISA R.Ganesan,
No.14/27, Somasundara 5th Street,
Ayanvaram, Chennai 600 023.                                                      ……Complainant.     
                                                                          //Vs//
1.Goodsun Industries Private Limited,
    Rep. by its Director,
    No.6/42, Kallapalayam Village,
    Near Kamachi Amman Kovil,
    Kallapalayam, Coimbatore 641 201.

2.Goodsun Industries Private Limited,
    Rep. by its Director,
    SF 206, Perks Campus,
    Rajalakshmi Mill Street, Coimbatore 641 015.

3.Goodsun Industries Private Limited,
    Branch Office, Rep.by its Director,
    No.1, V.V.Colony Road,
    Lakshmi Nagar, 
    Adambakkam, Chennai 600 088.                                         .......Opposite parties. 
                         
This complaint has been filed before DCDRC, Chennai (North) as CC.No.24/2019 and transferred to this commission by the order of the Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai and taken on file  as CC.No.50/2022.             
  The complaint was filed by the complainant under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 alleging deficiency in service in selling a defective product along with a prayer to direct the opposite parties to pay the cost of defective product Rs.83,000/- and to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- towards compensation for the mental agony and hardship caused to the complainant due to the deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties. 
No representation for complainant inspite of service of notice on 11.07.2022.  Written arguments not filed by the complainant. Sufficient opportunities given for filing  written arguments and for appearance on 15.07.2022, 05.08.2022, 24.08.2022, 15.09.2022, 20.09.2022, 07.10.2022, 19.10.2022, 01.11.2022, 15.11.2022 and on 29.11.2022. In spite of the same, complainant failed to appear and prosecute the case. Hence, this commission is of the view that no purpose in keeping the complaint on file.  Hence the consumer complaint is dismissed for non prosecution.  No cost.
This order was pronounced by us in the open Commission on this 29th November 2022. 

   Sd/-                                                                                                                Sd/-

MEMBER-II                                                                                                  PRESIDENT