West Bengal

Burdwan

CC/17/2015

Sk Maniuddin - Complainant(s)

Versus

Goldmine group of companies along the sister companies Agro & Industry. - Opp.Party(s)

Bikash Kumar Roy

11 Nov 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
166 Nivedita Pally, Muchipara, G.T. Road, P.O. Sripally,
Dist Burdwan - 713103
 
Complaint Case No. CC/17/2015
 
1. Sk Maniuddin
Vill & P.O Talit,
Burdwan
WestBengal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Goldmine group of companies along the sister companies Agro & Industry.
2 of 2A Dr, .S.S Sankar Road ,P.S Entaly , Gupta house 2nd floor Kolkata 700014.
WestBengal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Asoke Kumar Mandal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Silpi Majumder Member
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 11 Nov 2016
Final Order / Judgement

Consumer Complaint No.17 of 2015

 

 

Date of filing: 14.01.2015                                                             Date of disposal: 11.11.2016.

 

 

Complainants: Sk. Maniuddin, S/o. Sk. Ali Asraf, Resident of Talit, P.O.-Talit, Dist.-Burdwan,

                   Pin-713141, In respective capacity against himself whose certificate is produced

                   as evidence and in respect of :-

                 

1.Basudeb Chatterjee 2. Dulal Chandra Sidai 3. Soma Mallick 4. Goutam Mallick 5. Ram Prasad mallick 6. Mira Laha 7.Mira Laha 8. Bhubaneswar Laha 9.Bhubaneswar  Laha 10. Pratima Chatterjee 11. Raj Kumar Gorai 12. Subhadeep Ghosh 13. Subhodeep Ghosh 14. Soma Das 15. Arati laha 16. Manasha Lohar 17. Chand Kumar Hazra 18. Ashish Hazra 19. Kabita Rani Hazra 20. Manushri Laha 21. Shyamal Kumar laha 22. Puspa Santra 23. Sanjit Santra 24. Khokon Halder 25. Partha Sarathi Halder 26. Balaram Gadi 27.Sanjoy Lohar 28. Saraswati Lohar 29. Malek Molla 30. Uttam Ghosh 31. Tajmira Begum 32.  Uttam Ghosh 33. Tajmira Begum 34. Sk. Mainuddin 35. Sk. Mainuddin 36.Gafru Sk. 37. Ajmira Begum Molla 38. Tajmira Begum 39. Mukbul Hossain Mallick 40. Sk.Mainuddin 41. Sk. Moinuddin 42. Sk. Sirajul Haque 43. Sk. Sirajul Haque 44. Tajmira Begum 45. Uttam Ghosh 46. Sk. Moinuddin 47. Ajmira Begum Molla 48. Ajmira Begum Molla 49. Ajmira Begum Molla 50. Bhubaneswar Laha 51. Bhubaneswar Laha.

 

-VERSUS-

 

Opposite Party: 1.Gold Mine Group of Companies Pvt. Ltd., 2/2A, Dr. Suresh Sarkar Road, 2nd

                                  floor, Kolkata-700 014, represented by Bablu Saha, S/o. Montulal Saha

                                  (Managing Director), Milan Park, Balagarh, Hooghly, Pin-712149.

 

                              2. The Branch Office of Goldmine Group of Companies Pvt. Ltd.,

                                  Vill. & P.O.- Budbud Bazar, Burdwan, (Near State Bank ATM), Dist.-

                                  Burdwan,  represented by Bablu Saha, S/o. Montulal Saha

                                  (Managing Director), Milan Park, Balagarh, Hooghly, Pin-712149.

 

Present :  Hon’ble President: Sri Asoke Kr. Mandal

     Hon’ble Member :  Smt. Silpi Majumder

 

Appeared for the Complainants:     Ld. Advocate, Bikash Roy.

Appeared for the Opposite Parties: None.

 

 

Order No.31, Dated: 11.11.2016

 

                Today is fixed for showing cause by the complainants as to why the case shall not be dismissed for default.  The complainant files hazira.  But the cause has not been shown by the complainant.  On scrutiny of the record it appears that by passing order No.30 dated 3.11.2016 this Forum has been pleased to observe that the complainants were given several opportunities to supply the correct address of the O.Ps. but the complainant failed to supply the correct address. Lastly, after amending the complaint new addresses of the O.Ps., supplied by the complainants, were inserted and the notices were issued for service upon the O.Ps.  It further appears that the complainants themselves received those notices at their own risk to serve the same upon the O.Ps.  But upto 3.11.2016 the complainants did not submit any document or evidence showing that the notices were sent for service upon the O.Ps.  Today on repeated calls none appears from the side of the complainants and in compliance with Order No.30 dated 3.11.2016 the complainants have not shown cause as to why the case shall not be dismissed for default.

                In the above premises, there is no alternative but to dismiss the case.  Hence, it is

Ordered

that the C.C. No.17/2015 is dismissed for default without any cost.

Let the copies of this order be supplied to the parties free of cost.

                         (Asoke Kr. Mandal)        

             Dictated and corrected by me.                                                           President       

                                                                                                                    D.C.D.R.F., Burdwan

                                                                                                                      

                   (Asoke Kr. Mandal)                     

                           President

                   D.C.D.R.F., Burdwan

(Silpi Majumder)

Member

D.C.D.R.F., Burdwan

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Asoke Kumar Mandal]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Silpi Majumder]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.