Andhra Pradesh

Visakhapatnam-II

CC/238/2014

Kotti Mahalakshmi - Complainant(s)

Versus

Golden Multi Services Club Limited - Opp.Party(s)

K. Gowri Shankara Rao

22 Jan 2015

ORDER

            Registration of the Complaint:01-08-2014

                            Date of Order:22-01-2015

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMERS FORUM-II

AT VISAKHAPATNAM

 

                   Present:

1.Sri H.ANANDHA RAO, M.A., L.L.B.,

       President

2.Sri C.V.RAO, M.A., B.L.,

                          Male Member

3.Smt.K.SAROJA, M.A., B.L.,

       Lady Member

                         

THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2015

CONSUMER CASE NO.238/2014

 

Between:

Smt. Kotti Mahalakshmi w/o late Raju, Hindu, Aged 28 years, r/at d.no.1-64/B, Polepalli village, Butchayyapeta, MDL, Visakhapatnam.

                                                …Complainant

And:

1.Golden Multi Services Club Ltd., Rep. by its Branch Manager,

Varanasime Gestrate Building,(Wood Land),Opp.Bank of India, Dwarakanagar, 2nd lane, Visakhapatnam.

2.M/s Reliance General Insurance Co., Ltd., Rep. by its Branch Manager (legal)  Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam.

3. M/s Reliance General Insurance Co., Ltd., Rep. by its Manager, 570, Naigaum Cross Road, Next to Royal Industrial Estate, Wadala (W) Mumbai-400 031.

4. M/s Reliance General Insurance Co., Ltd., Rep. by its Manager, Branch Office, 49, Dobson Road, 2nd floor,

Howrah-711101 (policy Servicing Branch Office)

 

…Opposite Parties

 

This case coming on 22-01-2015 for counter of OP3 in the presence of Sri.K.Gowri Shankar Rao, Advocate for the Complainant, and of Sri P.Murali Gopal, Advocate for the 1st Opposite Party, and of Sri D.Siva Prasad, Advocate for the 3rd Opposite Party and 2nd Opposite Party, being set exparte and having stood over till this day for consideration, the Forum made the following:

 

DOCKET ORDER

(As per the Orders of the Hon’ble President on behalf of the Bench)

 

Memo filed by the Complainant’s counsel, after issuing notice to OP, stating that the claim is settled for Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) and permitting to withdraw the complaint.

Heard, both sides. Memo is recorded. Compliant is withdrawn as not pressed. Hence, C.C. is closed. No costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced by us in the open Forum, on this the 22nd day of January, 2015.

 

    Sd/-                   Sd/-                            Sd/-

L.MEMBER             M.MEMBER                      PRESIDENT

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.