Karnataka

Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional

CC/1943/2019

Kiran M.B - Complainant(s)

Versus

Goibibo Group - Opp.Party(s)

06 Jan 2020

ORDER

BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27
 
Complaint Case No. CC/1943/2019
( Date of Filing : 18 Dec 2019 )
 
1. Kiran M.B
Age 47 No.253-43-173 2nd Main Road, Off. Leggere Bridge,Kempegowda Layout Bangalore-560058 Mob:9448433746
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Goibibo Group
RMZ Millenia, Tower A, 2nd Floor, Ulsoor road, Bengaluru-560008 Karnataka, India. Goibibo (Old Address) 2nd Floor, Tower A.D, Bhaskaran Road, Kensington Gardens, Kalhalli, Halsuru, Bangalore-560008 Karnataka, India Phone:080 42501300
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. H.R.SRINIVAS, B.Sc. LL.B., PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SURESH.D., B.Com., LL.B. MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 06 Jan 2020
Final Order / Judgement

 

Dated:06.01.2020

ORDERS ON MAINTAINABILITY

On perusing the complaint and on enquiring with the complaint. The complainant informed that he has booked the flight ticket to India via Singapore from Manilla(Philiphines). Hence no cause of action has taken place in India that too particularly in Bengaluru to which the jurisdiction of this forum extends. Further it is the specific case of the complainant that while booking the tickets through OP.No.1 at Manilla, he was not informed that he required get Transit VISA at Singapore to change the flight (onward journey).

 

In the complaint itself he has mentioned that the confirm ticket clearly states that transit visa is required for connecting International Airports inrespect of multiairlines and same to be acquired by concerned passengers.  The complainant is not a first time flyer. He is a regular visitor to foreign country and knows the rules and regulations of the countries or the airports in which he has to change over the aircrafts in respect of the transit visa. Inview of this, and as the OP has not at all taken any responsibility of providing the visa whether visa to the destination or the transit visa and also has not charged for the same in any respect we doubt as to the existence of the customer and service provider relations.  Hence the complaint is bereft of cause of action and prima facie, no deficiency of service on the part of OP and hence complaint is not maintainable on both counts. Hence COMPLAINT IS HEREBY DISMISSED.

 

 

 

MEMBER            PRESIDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. H.R.SRINIVAS, B.Sc. LL.B.,]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SURESH.D., B.Com., LL.B.]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.