Tamil Nadu

Thiruvallur

EA/2011/09

Prakash - Complainant(s)

Versus

Godrej & Boyce M.F.G. Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

V.Murali & others

17 Jun 2015

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
THIRUVALLUR
No.1-D, C.V.NAIDU SALAI, 1st CROSS STREET,
THIRUVALLUR-602 001
 
Complaint Case No. EA/2011/09
 
1. Prakash
T.M.P. Nagar, Padi, Ch-50
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Godrej & Boyce M.F.G. Ltd
Ambattur Estate, Ch-98
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  THIRU.S.PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M., PRESIDENT
  Tmt.S.Sujatha, B.Sc., MEMBER
  Mr.V.VENKATESAN, M.A., B.Ed., MBA.,M.Phil.,B.L MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:V.Murali & others, Advocate
For the Opp. Party: S.Ramasubramaniam, Advocate
ORDER

                              Filed On:           09.09.2011

                                                                                                                   Disposed On :    17.06.2015

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, THIRUVALLUR

PRESENT; THIRU. S. PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M.,                                            :   PRESIDENT

                   TMT.    S.  SUJATHA, B.SC.,                                                       :   MEMBER-I                                

              THIRU. V.  VENKATESAN, M.A.B.Ed., MBA. M.PHIL.B.L.,       :   MEMBER-II

 

Wednesday, the day of 17th June - 2015

E.A. 9 / 2011 In CC. No. 30 / 2010

Mr. P. Prakash,

S/o. Punniya Kodi,

No. 9, Old No. 57,

Appar Street, T.M.P. Nagar, Padi,

Chennai.                                                                                    …Petitioner / Complainant

 

-Vs-

 

1. The Manager,

    Godrej & Boyce M.F.G. Ltd.,

    Apppliances Division – 1

    Sidco State, Ambattur Estate,

    Chennai – 600 098.

 

2. Godrej & Boyce M.F.G. Ltd.,

    Rept. By its the Manager,

    Appliances Division, Pirojsh Nagar,

    Vikhroli,  Mumbai – 400 079.                                            …Respondents / Opposite Parties

 

Counsel For  Petitioner / Complainan t                       :  M/s. M. Parthasarathy, Adovcate

Counsel For  Respondents  / Opposite Parties            :  M/s.  S. Ramasubramaniam, Advocate

 

ORDER

 

No representation on both sides passed it over at 1.30 P.M.   Both parties are called absent.   No other representation,   for the long times.  It is seen from adjudication that it is pending for appearance of the parties from 16/12/2013.  But till date both parties did not appear to proceed further with.  It clearly shows the disinterest of the petitioner in the progress of this petition.  Therefore, there is no justification to prolong further.  Hence, petition is dismissed for default.  No Costs.

Sd/-                                                         Sd/-                                                       Sd/-

MEMBER – I                                        MEMBER – II                                              PRESIDENT

 
 
[ THIRU.S.PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M.,]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Tmt.S.Sujatha, B.Sc.,]
MEMBER
 
[ Mr.V.VENKATESAN, M.A., B.Ed., MBA.,M.Phil.,B.L]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.