Haryana

Karnal

CC/90/2024

Nidhi Goel - Complainant(s)

Versus

Globe Toyota - Opp.Party(s)

Abhishek Chaudhary

06 Mar 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                                  Complaint No.90 of 2024

                                                                     Date of instt.16.02.2024

                                                                     Date of Decision:06.03.2024

 

1. Nidhi Goel wife of Sh. Parveen Kumar Goel, R/o House No.873, Sector-13, Urban Estate, Karnal.
2. Raghav Goel son of Sh. Parveen Kumar Goel, R/o House No.873, Sector-13, Urban Estate, Karnal.

 

                                                                                      …….Complainants.

                                                Versus

1. Globe Toyota having its registered office at opposite PTC Madhuban, GT road, Karnal through its Managing Director.
2. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt., Ltd., having its head office at no.24, 10^th floor, Canara Block, Vittalmallya road, Banglore-560001, Karnataka through its Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer.

                                                                                      …..Opposite Parties.

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before       Sh. Jaswant Singh………President.  

                   Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                   Dr. Suman Singh………….Member.

 

Present: Sh. Jasroop Singh, counsel for the complainant.

                             

       Today the case is fixed for consideration on the point of admissibility.

                 Learned counsel for the complainant has suffered his separate statement to effect that he does not want to pursue with the present complaint further and withdraws the same on technical ground and sought permission to file the fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent Court of law.           

               In view of the above statement the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent Court of law, if so desired. The original documents annexed with the complaint, if any, be returned to the complainant by placing on record photocopies of the same. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:06.03.2024.               

                      President, 

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Suman Singh)

   Member                   Member