Kerala

StateCommission

116/2004

The Asst.Exe.Engineer - Complainant(s)

Versus

George M.Jacob - Opp.Party(s)

B.Sakthidharan Nair

04 Apr 2008

ORDER


.
CDRC, Sisuvihar Lane, Sasthamangalam.P.O, Trivandrum-10
Appeal(A) No. 116/2004

The Asst.Exe.Engineer
The Secretary
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

George M.Jacob
V.J.Joseph
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU 2. SMT.VALSALA SARNGADHARAN 3. SRI.M.A.ABDULLA SONA

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
1. The Asst.Exe.Engineer 2. The Secretary

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. George M.Jacob 2. V.J.Joseph

For the Appellant :
1. B.Sakthidharan Nair 2.

For the Respondent :
1. R.Gopakumar 2.



ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
APPEAL NO.116/04
JUDGMENT DATED.4.4.08
PRESENT
 
JUSTICE SHRI.KR.UDAYABHANU              -- PRESIDENT
SMT.VALSALA SARANGADHARAN              -- MEMBER
SHRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA                                      -- MEMBER
                                                                                                 
1. The Asst.Ex.Engineer,
    Electrical Major Section,
    KSEB, Pathanamthitta.
2. The Secretary,
    KSEB ,Pattom,                                                       -- APPELLANT
    Thiruvananthapuram.
       (By Adv.B.Sakthidharan Nair)
            Vs.
1. George.M.Jacob,
    Advocate,                                                              -- RESPONDENTS
    Pathanamthitta.
2. V.J.Joseph, Advocate,
    Pathananthitta.
       (By Adv.R.Gopakumar)                  
                       
JUDGMENT
 JUSTICE SHRI.KR.UDAYABHANU,PRESIDENT
 
          The appellants are the opposite parties/KSEB that has challenged the order to the forum directing the appellants to issue fresh bills including the complainants consumer number in the domestic tariff for the period from July 2001 to July 2002 and also to adjust the excess amount collected in the future bills and also to pay cost of Rs.1500/- in OP.188/02
          2. The case of the petitioners is that they are practicing lawyers and their office is functioning in a particular building with the particular consumer number. From the very beginning the petitioner’s office is included in non –domestic category and excess electrical charges are being realized. Hence the petitioners have sought for getting the tariff changed into domestic category and consequent relief’s.
          We find that as per the tariff order the offices of Advocates are included in LT VI B category/non-domestic. The tariff order is statutory in nature. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forums are not empowered to strike down the provisions of such orders.   The appropriate course for the complainants is to approach the High Court. We find that the Forum ie; CDRF, Pathanamthitta that has issued a direction in this regard is not empowered to do so. Hence the order of the form is set aside. The appeal is allowed.  
JUSTICE SHRI.KR.UDAYABHANU              --   PRESIDENT
 
 
SMT.VALSALA SARANGADHARAN              -- MEMBER
 
 
SHRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA                              -- MEMBER
 
 
s/L 



......................JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU
......................SMT.VALSALA SARNGADHARAN
......................SRI.M.A.ABDULLA SONA