Kerala

Kollam

CC/240/2020

Navas.N,aged 45 years, - Complainant(s)

Versus

General Manager, - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.A.JANI

30 Nov 2023

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Railway Station Road
Karbala Junction
Kollam-691001
Kerala.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/240/2020
( Date of Filing : 06 Oct 2020 )
 
1. Navas.N,aged 45 years,
S/o.Nuhukannu,resding at Navas Manzil, Umayanalloor.P.O,Kollam.represented through his Power holder.M.Noohukannu,aged 78 years,Navas Manzil, Umayanalloor.P.O, Kollam.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. General Manager,
Tata Motors Finance Limited,10th Floor and B maker Chambers III, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021.
2. Manager/Authorized Officer,
Tata Motors Finance Limited,Corporate Office of Tata Finance Motor Limited,1st Floor,Manapurathu Building,Vadakkevila.P.O,Pallimukku,Kollam-691010.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. S.K.SREELA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 30 Nov 2023
Final Order / Judgement

   IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

             KOLLAM

                                                 C.C.No. 240/2020

 

                                                                                                     PRESENT

SMT. S.K.SREELA, B.A.L, LL.B, PRESIDENT

SRI. STANLY HAROLD, B.A.LL.B, MEMBER 

                      ORDER DATED:   30.11.2023.

BETWEEN

Navas N., 45 years,

S/o Nuhukannu, residing at Navas Manzil,

Umayanalloor P.O., Kollam

Rep.through his Power holder M.Noohukannu,

78 years, Navas Manzil, Umayanalloor P.O.,

Kollam.                                                                       :                       Complainant

(By Adv.A Jani)

AND

  1.             General  Manager,

Tata Motors Finance Ltd.,

  1.  

Nariman Point, Mumbai 400021.

          (By Adv.Vivek R. & Adv.M.S.Ajithkumar)

  1.             Manager/Authorized Officer,

Tata Motors Finance Ltd.,

Corporate Office of Tata Finance Motor Ltd.,

  1.  

Vadakkevila P.O., Pallimukku, Kollam 691010.     :                     Opposite parties

            (By Adv.Vivek R. & Adv.M.S.Ajithkumar)

ORDER

S.K.SREELA, PRESIDENT

              Complainant continuously absent, no representation also inspite of specific direction to appear today.  Hence it is presumed that the complainant is not interested in pursuing the matter.  In view of the above, the complaint is dismissed.  No order as to costs.

Dated this the 30th day of November 2023.

                                    Sd/-

S.K.SREELA

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

STANLY HAROLD

MEMBER

                                                                                    

 

                                                                                                                                                                                     Forwarded/by Order                      

                            Senior superintendent

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. S.K.SREELA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.