Kerala

Malappuram

CC/156/2019

JISHAD M - Complainant(s)

Versus

GENERAL MANAGER - Opp.Party(s)

03 Mar 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
MALAPPURAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/156/2019
( Date of Filing : 21 May 2019 )
 
1. JISHAD M
MADASSERI HOUSE MARUTHA PO MUNDAPOTTY NILAMBUR
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. GENERAL MANAGER
SPICE JET LTD HEAD OFFICE 319 UDYOG VIHAR PHASE IV GURGAON 122016 HARYANA
2. MANAGER
SPICE JET LTD BAGDORA AIRPORT SILIGURI BANGAL 734421
3. MANAGER
SPICE JET LTD NO 10 BANGLURU INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SULIBELE ROAD SHANTHI NAGAR DEVANAHALLI BANGLURU 562110
4. MANAGER
SPICE JET LTD KARIPOOR PADINHARATHARA MALAPPURAM 673647
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. MOHANDASAN K PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. PREETHI SIVARAMAN C MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 03 Mar 2022
Final Order / Judgement

1.Case of the complainant:-

     Complainant is a soldier at Indian Army.  On 31/10/2018 complainant had booked

one flight ticket  for travelling on 07/12/2018 from  Bagdogra to Calicut to see  his mother, who was sick at that time.  On 07/12/2018 complainant reached at the Bagdogra Airport in time and security checking and other formalities were done for travelling at 15.20.  But the above said flight was late for one hour.  As per the ticket and the information, the above said flight will reached at Bangalore at 18.15. But it  was reached at Bangalore airport after one hour of arrival time  mentioned in the ticket.

2.      When complainant reached at Bangalore Airport, CISF Jawans who were standing at the security checking at Bangalore Airport told to the complainant that the connection flight from Bangalore to Calicut had already departed from Bangalore before landing of complainant’s flight. Thereafter complainant contacted the helpline number of Bangalore Airport authority and they informed the complainant that  the connection flight from Bangalore to Calicut had already gone  and  the difficulty caused due to the late coming of  Bagdogra  to Bangalore flight.  Then the staff of Spice Jet Office told to the complainant that the next flight will be available at 9.55 PM on the next day.  Thereafter complainant asked for food accommodation for him, but that lady and other staff of Spice Jet told to complainant that they are “helpless”.  Then complainant told about the inconveniences caused to him and other passengers to opposite parties and then also they said that they are not responsible.   Thereafter complainant given his ID card to opposite party officials then they said that they will arrange a ticket at Air Asia flight to travel to Cochi and provided a ticket and a boarding pass to complainant.  Complainant reached at Cochi Airport  at 11.00 PM. Due  to  the  act  of opposite parties complainant suffered a lot.  

Complainant booked a ticket from Bagdogra to Calicut with same PNR Number and it is the duty  and responsibility of opposite parties  to drop the passengers  at their   place  in time  even if  there is two different connection flights.  There is clear deficiency of service from the side of opposite parties.

3.     Claim of the complainant is that   he is entitled to get Rs. 8700/-,  the taxi fare from  Cochi to  his native place , and he is also entitled to get Rs. 50,000/- for mental agony and hardship suffered by him by the act of opposite parties and  Rs. 25,000/- as cost.

4.          On admission of the complaint notice was issued to the opposite parties  and notice served on them  and opposite party No.1 to 3 appeared before the Commission and filed Vakkalath and Authorisation letter  from Spice Jet. Opposite party No.4 not appeared before the Commission , hence set exparte.

5.            In order to substantiate the case of the complainant, he filed an affidavit in lieu of Chief examination and the documents he produced were marked as Ext. A1 to A5. Ext.A1 is the ticket  for travelling from Bagdogra to Calicut  booked on 31/10/2018 with PNR Number, Ext.A2 is the  Boarding pass with seat No. issued by opposite parties  to complainant for travelling  on 07/12/2018 from Bagdogra to Calicut, Ext.A3  is the  e-mail communication  sent by opposite parties to complainant on 7/12/2018 at 3.15 PM at the time of boarding from Bagdogra Airport by complainant,  Ext.A4 is the details regarding  the time schedules  of SG715 No. flight from Bagdogra  on 7/12/2018 taken from  flight status.com . Ext.A5 is the boarding pass issued to complainant by Air Asia on 07/12/2018   for travelling from Bangalore Airport to Nedumbasseri (Cochi) Airport.

6.         Opposite party No.1 to 3 filed Vakkalath and Authorisation letter.  Thereafter on 27/02/2020 they filed a petition as per IA 115/2020 for providing  the PNR Number of the ticket booked by the complainant.  They stated that complainant is not mentioned about the PNR Number in the complaint  filed by him.  They again stated that without getting the PNR Number of the ticket, the opposite parties are not in a position to know the details of the ticket booked by the complainant. PNR number is necessary to prepare the version. Opposite parties No.1 to 3 filed IA 115/2020 to direct the complainant to provide the PNR Number mentioned in the ticket. Complainant filed affidavit on 1/07/2020 with documents Ext. A1 to A5. Ext. A1 document is the flight ticket booked on 31/10/2018, there mentioned the PNR No. LY19UZ but opposite parties not filed version and affidavit to prove their case.  Even after getting the PNR Number, they did not file version and affidavit. Hence we are on the opinion that they have no objection in the complaint filed by complainant.

7.     The allegations against opposite parties are proved by the unchallenged evidence of complainant. There is no contra evidence in this matter.   Moreover complainant produced five documents which are very supportive to prove his case.  Hence the Commission finds that there is deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties as alleged in the complaint. Hence we allow this complaint holding that opposite party No.1 to 4 are deficient in service. 8.  8.     Hence we allow this complaint  as follows:-

  1. The opposite parties are directed to give Rs. 8700/-(Rupees Eight thousand and seven hundred only) to the complainant,  the taxi fare he had paid  for travelling  from  Cochi to  his native place.
  2. The opposite parties are directed to pay compensation of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only)to the complainant on account of deficiency in service on the part of opposite parties and thereby caused mental agony, physical hardships and sufferings to the complainant.
  3. The opposite parties are also directed to pay Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten thousand  only) as cost of the proceedings.

          If the above said amount is not paid to the complainant within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the opposite parties are  liable to pay the interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the said amount from the date of receipt of the copy of this order till realisation.

                Dated this 3rd day of March , 2022.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. MOHANDASAN K]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PREETHI SIVARAMAN C]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.