West Bengal

Murshidabad

EA/19/2016

Sri Aniruddha Upadhyay - Complainant(s)

Versus

General Manager, Sodexo Facilities Management Services Pvt. Ltd & Another - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Prabir Banerjee

31 Oct 2017

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Berhampore, Murshidabad.
 
Execution Application No. EA/19/2016
In
Complaint Case No. CC/149/2015
 
1. Sri Aniruddha Upadhyay
S/O- Aditya Nath Upadhyay, 18/5 S.N. Bagchi Road, PO & PS- Berhampore, Pin- 742101
Murshidabad
West Bengal
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. General Manager, Sodexo Facilities Management Services Pvt. Ltd & Another
EN-7, Biswanath Buildings, Sector-V, Salt Lake City, kolkata- 700091
2. Facility Manager, Sodexo Facilities Management Services Pvt. Ltd.
EN-7, Biswanath Buildings, Sector-V, Salt Lake City, Kolkata- 700091
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. ANUPAM BHATTACHARYYA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. CHANDRIMA CHAKRABORTY MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. MANAS KUMAR MUKHERJEE MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 31 Oct 2017
Final Order / Judgement

Sri Manas Kumar Mukherjee, Member.

            The instant complaint u/S 25 & 27 of C.P.Act, 1986 has been filed by one Sasanka Sekhar Mondal, Decree Holder on 26.07.2016 herein against the Judgments Debtor for execution of final order dated 26.04.2016 passed by this Forum. It was ordered that the Complaint Case No.149/2015 be and the same was allowed in ex-parte against the Opposite party with a litigation cost of Rs.5000.00. The complaint and Opposite Party No.1 &2 were directed to pay jointly and or severally the sum deposited in the Provident Fund along with interest @ 9% per annum since the investment and the proceeds of Employee State Insurance within 45 days from the date of receiving this order. No other reliefs were awarded to the complainant for harassment and mental agony. At the event of failure to comply with the order  the Opposite Party  shall pay cost @ Rs.50/- for each day’s delay, if caused, on expiry of the aforesaid 45 days by depositing the accrued amount, if any, in the  Consumer legal Aid Account.

            We find that the D.hr has received his awarded amount in full and the Jdr.s has also paid the fine amount for delayed payment in compliance with the order of this Forum. So, we have no other alternative but to dispose of this Execution Application with full satisfaction.

          The Dhr has not taken any step. Also, we find that there is nothing to proceed further with the case and the case be disposed of finally

           We find that the there is nothing to comply further by the Jdr.s and as such the case be disposed of finally. 

Hence,

                                                                                                    Ordered

that the Execution Application No. EA/19/2016 be and the same is disposed of finally.

         Let a plain copy of this order be made available and be supplied free of cost, to each of the parties on contest in person, Ld. Advocate/Agent on record, by hand under proper acknowledgment / be sent forthwith under ordinary post  to the concerned parties as per rules, for information and necessary action.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. ANUPAM BHATTACHARYYA]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. CHANDRIMA CHAKRABORTY]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. MANAS KUMAR MUKHERJEE]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.