Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/18/341

Sajeer - Complainant(s)

Versus

Geepee suzuki - Opp.Party(s)

25 Feb 2023

ORDER

                   BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

                               SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN         : PRESIDENT

                               SMT.PREETHA.G.NAIR   : MEMBER

                               SRI.VIJU.V.R.                 : MEMBER

                                                     

CC.NO.341/2018 (Filed on : 17/09/2018)

ORDER DATED : 25/02/2023

 

COMPLAINANT

Sajeer,

S/o.Nizarudeen.A

Sajeer Manzil, Vengode,

Kudavoor.P.O, Keezhthonnakkal village,

Thiruvananthapuram

(By Adv.S.S.Biju)

                                                          VS

OPPOSITE PARTIES

 

  1. Geepee Suzuki,

Poovanpara, Alamcode,

Salem Kanyakumari Highway Road,

Attingal, Thiruvananthapuram

  1. Suzuki Motorcycle India Pvt Ltd,
  2.  

Nelson Mandela Road, Vasanhkunj,

New Delhi – 110070

  1. HDFC Bank Ltd,

M.G.Road, Thiruvananthapuram

  1. Maruti Insurance Broking Pvt Ltd,

1, Nelson Mandela Road,

Vasantkunj, New Delhi -110070

(OP1 by Adv.R.K.Rajeswari)

(OP3 by Adv.T.L.Sreeram)

(OP4 by Adv.P.Jayabal Menon)

 

ORDER

SRI.VIJU.V.R                           : MEMBER

1.         This complaint is filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986.  This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties in respect of his bike. The opposite parties has not resolved the vehicle’s problem. Alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties the complainant approached this Commission for redressing his grievances. The opposite parties entered appearance and filed written version denying the allegation of deficiency in service raised by the complainant against them.

2.       Eventhough the complainant has filed affidavit in-lieu of chief examination, the complainant was not present before this commission to adduce his evidence. So many opportunities were given to the complainant for adducing the evidence. As he has not produced any evidence, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed.

     In the result, the complaint is dismissed. No order as to costs.

                    A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

               Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 25th day of February 2023.

                                                                                          Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN   : PRESIDENT

 

                                                                                              Sd/-

  PREETHA .G.NAIR: MEMBER

 

                                                                                             Sd/-

VIJU.V.R     : MEMBER

 

 

 

Be/

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.