Haryana

StateCommission

RP/42/2016

GURMAIL SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

GARG MOTORS - Opp.Party(s)

RAJINDER SINGLA

09 Aug 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA

 

 

                                                Revision Petition No.   42 of 2016

                                                Date of Institution :      03.06.2016

                                                Date of Decision   :      09.08.2016

 

 

Gurmail Singh son of Sh. Kehar Singh, resident of Village Ralla, Tehsil and District Mansa.

Petitioner-Complainant

 

Versus

 

1.      Garg Motors, Hissar Road, Sirsa through its Manager/Managing Director/Partner/Proprietor.

2.      Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, SCO 17, Sector 26D, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh through its General Manager (Sales) or competent authority.

3.      Kansal Auto Finance, Near Guru Nanak Children Hospital, Link Road, Mansa through its Proprietor/Partner.

Respondents-Opposite Parties

 

 

CORAM :   Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President

                   Mr. B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.

                   Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.

                  

Present :             Sh. Rajinder Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

                   None for the respondents.

                                     

O R D E R

 

 

NAWAB SINGH J, (ORAL)

 

          By filing this revision petition, Gurmail Singh-complainant (petitioner herein) has challenged the order dated December 16^th, 2015 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sirsa (for short ‘District Forum’) whereby his evidence was closed by the Forum.  

2.      It is the case of the petitioner that due to false implication of his son Sukhpal Singh and daughter Avtar Kaur in FIR No.284 dated October 01^st, 2015 under Section 498A, 406 and 34 IPC, he could not properly pursue the complaint.  He may be allowed to conclude his evidence for proper adjudication of the matter in a more complete and effective manner. 

3.      Be that as it may and considering the golden principle that everyone approaching the temple of justice should feel satisfied in the matter of getting opportunity to present his or her case as good as he or she can, this revision petition is accepted and impugned order is set aside.

4.      The parties are directed to appear before the District Forum on August 29^th, 2016.              

5.      Copy of this order alongwith record be sent to the District Forum.

           

August 09th, 2016

Diwan Singh Chauhan Member

B.M.Bedi Judicial Member

Nawab Singh President

(U.K.)