BEML Employees Credit Co-operative Society (Regd.) filed a consumer case on 19 May 2010 against Ganga Ramaiah in the Kolar Consumer Court. The case no is CC/09/186 and the judgment uploaded on 30 Nov -0001.
Karnataka
Kolar
CC/09/186
BEML Employees Credit Co-operative Society (Regd.) - Complainant(s)
Versus
Ganga Ramaiah - Opp.Party(s)
19 May 2010
ORDER
THE DISTRICT CONSUMAR DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM No.419, Ist Floor,. H.N. Gowda Building, M.B.Road, Kolar-563101 consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/186
BEML Employees Credit Co-operative Society (Regd.)
...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
Ganga Ramaiah The Medical Officer
...........Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
ORDER
CC Filed on 06.11.2009 Disposed on 10.06.2010 BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOLAR. DATED: 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2010 PRESENT: Sri. G.V.HEGDE, President. Sri. T.NAGARAJA, Member. Smt. K.G.SHANTALA, Member. --- Consumer Complaint No. 186/2009 Between: BEML Employees Credit Co-operative Society Limited, Maharaja Road, Robertsonpet, Kolar Gold Fields. Represented by its Secretary. -V/s- 1. Shri Ganga Ramaiah, Primary Health Centre, Kaivara, Chintamani Taluk, Chikkaballapur District. 2. The Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Kaivara, Chintamani Tq., Chikkaballapur District. .Complainant. .Opposite Parties. ORDERS This is a complaint filed Under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying for a direction against the opposite party No.2 to effect prompt deduction of the loan installments and to credit the same to complainant-Society with costs, etc., 2. The material facts of complainants case may be stated as follows: That the complainant is a credit co-operative society and OP.1 who is working as a government servant, is an associate member of complainant-society and that OP.1 had borrowed Rs.30,000/- on 16.07.2004 while he was working at Primary Health Centre, Vokkaleri, Kolar agreeing to repay the loan and interest in 33 monthly installments of Rs.1,400/- and in default agreeing to pay overdue interest at one and a quarter time the ordinary rate of interest from the due date to the date of regularization of payment. Further that OP.1 was working under the Administrative Medical Officer, Vokkaleri, who was Pay Disbursing Officer and that the said officer had undertaken to deduct the installments becoming due out of the salary payable to OP.1 and to remit the same to complainant-society and that he failed to deduct the said installments as undertaken and to remit to complainant-society and that he had also undertaken to instruct the subsequent Pay Disbursing Officer to effect the deduction in the event of the transfer of OP.1 to any other place. It is made out that for the present OP.1 has been working in Primary Health Centre, Kaivara, Chinthamani Taluk and OP.2 is the present Pay Disbursing Officer. It is made out that OP.2 has also not effected deduction of installments and that OP.1 has also failed to repay the loan and the installments. It is alleged that for the present certain amount is outstanding in the said loan account of OP.1. 3. The notice issued by this Forum to OP.2 under RPAD was served but OP.2 remained absent. The Notice sent to OP.1 under RPAD was returned unserved with the endorsement that he refused to receive the notice. The OPs did not file any version. The complainant filed affidavit in support of the allegations made in the complaint. 4. The averments in the complaint may be believed to be true as OP.1 and OP.2 remained absent. The undertaking letter dated: 12.07.2004 issued by Administrative Medical Officer, PHC, Vokkaleri, who was the then Pay Disbursing Officer shows that in the event of transfer of the employee he would instruct the subsequent Pay Disbursing Officer to effect deduction. The affidavit of complainant shows that the subsequent Pay Disbursing Officer namely OP.2 has not made such deduction which amounts to deficiency in service. Hence we pass the following:- O R D E R The complaint is Allowed. OP.2 is directed to deduct Rs.1,400/- per month out of the monthly salary payable to OP.1 and to credit the same to complainant-society till the closure of loan. The parties shall bear their own costs. Dictated to the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced in open Forum this the 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2010. MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.