Circuit Bench Nagpur

StateCommission

MA/10/87

PRAMOD BALKRUSHANA JOSHI - Complainant(s)

Versus

GANESH MADHUKAR VITHALKAR - Opp.Party(s)

ADV. J.C. SHUKLA

20 Sep 2011

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA CIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR 5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1 CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001

Miscellaneous Application No. MA/10/87   1. PRAMOD BALKRUSHANA JOSHI R/O. WARD NO. 1, ARNI, TQ. ARNI, DIST. YAVATMAL. ...........Appellant(s) Versus 1. GANESH MADHUKAR VITHALKAR R/O. WARD NO.1, ARNI, TQ. ARNI, DIST. YAVATMAL. 2. SUDAM PANDURANG ADE WARD NO. 1, ARNI, TQ. ARNI. YAVATMAL MAHARASHTRA 3. SAU. VIMAL BABARAO RAUT WARD NO. 1, ARNI, TQ. ARNI. YAVATMAL MAHARASHTRA 4. VISHNU KISANRAO RAUT WARD NO. 1, ARNI, TQ. ARNI YAVATMAL MAHARASHTRA 5. DADRAO AMBADAS SURYVANSHI WARD NO. 1, ARNI, TQ. ARNI YAVATMAL MAHARASHTRA 6. KAILASH KESHAVRAO GAVHARKAR WARD NO. 1, ARINI, TQ. ARNI. YAVATMAL MAHARASHTRA 7. SHANKAR DAULATRAO TAYADE WARD NO. 1, ARNI, TQ. ARNI, YAVATMAL MAHARASHTRA 8. SAU. CHBUTAI KISANRAO RAUT WARD NO.1, ARNI, TQ. ARNI YAVATMAL MAHARASHTRA 9. UTTAMRAO MLAJI RAHATE WARD NO. 1, ARNI, TQ. ARNI YAVATMAL MAHARASHTRA 10. SUHAS RAMRAO TAYADE WARD NO. 1, ARNI, TQ. ARNI YAVATMAL MAHARASHTRA 11. RAMSINGH BANDU JADHAV WARD NO. 1, ARNI, TQ. ARNI YAVATMAL MAHARASHTRA 12. RAVISHEKHAR DULSINGH RATHOD WARD NO. 1, ARNI, TQ. ARNI YAVATMAL MAHARASHTRA 13. ANANTSINGH BHARATSINGH THAKUR WARD NO. 1, ARNI, TQ. ARNI YAVATMAL MAHARASHTRA 14. SAU. SHALINI UTTAMRAO DESHMUKH WARD NO. 1, ARNI, TQ. ARNI YAVATMAL MAHARASHTRA 15. GANGADHAR BUDHAJI AMBULKAR WARD NO. 1, ARNI, TQ. ARNI YAVATMAL MAHARASHTRA ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:     Hon'ble Mr.S.M. Shembole PRESIDING MEMBER   HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL MEMBER   HON'BLE N. ARUMUGAM MEMBER

PRESENT: None ......for the Appellant   None ......for the Respondent

ORDER Per Mr S M Shembole, Hon’ble Presiding Member         This is an application for restoration of appeal No.A/06/430, which was dismissed for default.        Applicant as well as his counsel is absent. Perused the application under order and the copies of documents produced alongwith the application.        At the outset, we may mention here that this application for restoration of appeal is not tenable before this Commission. This Commission has no jurisdiction to restore any complaint or appeal which is dismissed for default. Under CPA 1986, except National Commission, there is no jurisdiction to any State Commission for restoration of such appeal or complaint which is dismissed for default.    Hence, this application stands dismissed. No order as to cost. Copy of this order be supplied to the parties.   Pronounecd on 20.09.2011.

[ Hon'ble Mr.S.M. Shembole] PRESIDING MEMBER   [ HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL] MEMBER   [ HON'BLE N. ARUMUGAM] MEMBER