Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/216/2013

HYUNDAI MOTOR INDIA LIMITED, THE CORPORATE MANAGER - Complainant(s)

Versus

G. SIJESH - Opp.Party(s)

FOX MANDAL AND ASSO

30 Mar 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                        PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. S. KARUPPIAH                                             JUDICIAL MEMBER

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                          MEMBER

 

F. A. No.216/2013

 

(Against the Order dt.27.03.2013 made in C.C. No.394/2011 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Coimbatore – 18.)

DATED THE 30^TH DAY OF MARCH 2022

 

The Corporate Manager,

M/s. Hyundai Motors India Ltd.,

Registered Office at:-

Plot No.H-1, SIPCOT

Industrial Park, Irrungattukottai,

Sriperumbudur Taluk,

Kancheepuram District,

Tamil Nadu – 602 105.                                                  .. Appellant / 2^nd Opposite party.

 

-Versus-

1. G. Sijesh,

S/o. Mr. M. Ganesan,

No.68/20, 8^th Street,

Anna Nagar,

K K Pudur,

Coimbatore – 641 038.                                                .. 1^st Respondent / Complainant.

 

2. The Chief Manager,

M/s. Chandra Hyundai,

No.651, Avinashi Road,

P.N. Palayam,

Coimbatore – 641 038.                                         .. 2^nd Respondent / 1^st Opposite party.

 

Counsel for Appellant / Complainant             : M/s. Surana & Surana

Respondents 1 & 2 / Opposite parties 1 & 2 : Served called absent

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 30.03.2022 for appearance of appellant and for reporting settlement or for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

 

Docket Order

 

Appellant present.  When the matter is taken up for consideration, the Counsel for the appellant has made an endorsement on the Grounds of Appeal stating that the matter has been settled between the parties out of the Commission.

In view of the endorsement, the appeal is dismissed as settled out of Commission.  No order as to cost.

The appellant is entitled to the Mandatory deposit.  Hence, the Registry is directed to discharge the mandatory deposit along with accrued interest in favour of the appellant.

 

               

                  Sd/-                                          Sd/-                                            Sd/-

R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                S. KARUPPIAH                               R.SUBBIAH

            MEMBER                             JUDICIAL MEMBER                           PRESIDENT