By Smt. Padmini Sudheesh, President: <br /> <br /> Petitioner was a subscriber of respondent firm and joined in four kuries as per statement Nos.107, 108, 46 and 47. As per statement Nos.107 and 108 he had remitted a total sum of Rs.26,000/-and as per statement Nos.46 and 47 he had also remitted a total sum of Rs.52,000/-. From 2006 January onwards he couldn’t remit the kuri amount due to stoppage of functioning of the firm. So the due amount to be returned. Hence this complaint.<br /> <br /> 2. Respondent is set exparte.<br /> <br /> 3. To prove the case, petitioner has filed affidavit and documents, which are marked as Exts. P1 to P7. <br /> <br /> 4. According to the petitioner, he is entitled to receive Rs.52,000/- as per statement Nos.46 and 47. But the pass books shown that the amount due is Rs.51,840/-. So he is entitled for that amount only. He also claimed 12% interest. As per Exts. P1 and P2 pass books the total amount due is seen Rs.51,840/-. So he is entitled for that amount only. There is no counter evidence. <br /> <br /> 5. So the petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to return an amount of Rs.77,840/- (Rupees seventy seven thousand eight hundred and forty only) with interest at the rate of 12% from 2006 January onwards till realisation and also to pay Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred only) towards costs to the petitioner. Comply the order within two months. <br /> <br /> Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the open Forum, this the 7th day of July 2008.<br />