Haryana

Karnal

CC/295/2023

Ranbeer Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Fullerton India Credit Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Ajit Pal Maan

23 Aug 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.295 of 2023

                                                          Date of instt.24.05.2023

                                                          Date of Decision: 23.08.2024

 

Ranbeer Singh son of Shri Nathu Ram, resident of H.No.12, VPO Phoosgarh, Karnal.

 

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

1. Fullerton India Credit Company Limited, SCO No.12, Sector-8, HUDA Market, Karnal.
2. Fullerton India Credit Company Limited, Supreme IT Park, 5^th and 6^th Floor, B-Wing, Behind Lake Castle Hiranandani Gardens, Powai 400076 Mumbai.
3. Fullerton India Credit Company Limited, Megh-Towers, 3^rd Floor, Old No.307, New No.165, Poonamallee High Road, Maduravoyal,. Chennai 600095, Tamil Nadu.                                                                                          ....Opposite parties.

 

  Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Mrs. Sarvjeet Kaur…………Member

                               

Present:   None for the Complainant.

                Shri Ravi Mehta, counsel for the OPs.

                                                         

               Today the case is fixed evidence of complainant, subject to second last opportunities. None has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. Position remained the same on the adjourned date. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 03:30 PM. No further wait is justified.

                   A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OPs on 16.08.2023. The complainant has availed several effective opportunities for leading his evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint.     Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission and would cause to harass the OPs.

                   Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated: 23.08.2024.          

                   President,

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

                (Saravjeet Kaur) 

                      Member