1. Sushil kumarson of Mukateshvar Dayak shrivastav r/o Baba Deep singh Nagar,Bathinda.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus.
1. Fullerton India credit co. ltd,.Building no.11 , sco no,. 141-42,Sector 8-C,Madhya Marg, First floor, chandigarh.2. Fullerton India credit co. building no.11,First floor,solitare,corp opark,Andheri Ghatkopar,line road,chakla, Andheri (E) Mumbai. through its M.D.3. Fullerton India credit co.ltd.Br,Manager, opp.zila Parishad Buidling G.T.Road,Bathinda.
...........Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
PRESENT :
O.P.Vinocha,Adv., Advocate for Complainant
Sh.R.P.Singh,O.P.s., Advocate for Opp.Party
Dated : 08 Aug 2011
JUDGEMENT
Statement of Sh.O.P.Vinocha,counsel for the complainant W.O.
Stated that as per instructions of the complainant I do not want to proceed with this complaint at the stage. I may be allowed to withdraw the complaint at the stage,
RO&AC
Member Member President.
8.8.11.
8.8.11 Present: Sh.O.P.Vinocha,counsel for the complainant.
Sh.R.P.Singh,counsel for opposite parties.
Opposite parties closed their evidence. In view the above statement made by counsel for the complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Parties are left to bear their own costs. File be consigned.
Member Member President.
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
