Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/12/128

Rafeeque.E.A. - Complainant(s)

Versus

French Express Net Work Pvt.Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

A.B.Nair, Kasaragod

12 Feb 2013

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/12/128
 
1. Rafeeque.E.A.
S/o.Abdulla, Delux Fancy Chattanchal, Po. Thekkil, Kasaragod
Kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. French Express Net Work Pvt.Ltd
No.30, 'U' Block 10th street, Annanagar, Chennai. Tamilnadu.600040
Chennai
Tamil Nadu
2. French Express Net work Pvt.Ltd
Creative Commnication, CJB 576, Kovai City Coimbatore, Tamilnadu
Coimbatore
Tamilnadu
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. K.T.Sidhiq PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE P.Ramadevi Member
 HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G. MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

                                                                            Date of filing       :       28-04-2012 

                                                                            Date of order       :       30-01-2013

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                                CC.128/2012

                         Dated this, the 30th     day of   January 2013

RESENT

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ                                             : PRESIDENT

SMT.P.RAMADEVI                                      : MEMBER                    

SMT. K.G.BEENA                                        : MEMBER

 

Rafeeque.E.A, S/o. Abdulla,                                    : Complainant

Delux Fancy, Chattanchal,

Po.Thekkil, Kasaragod.Dt.

(Adv.A.Balakrishnan Nair,Kasaragod)

 

1. Franch Express Network Pvt.Ltd,                       : Opposite parties

    No.30,’U’ Block, 10th street,Ammanagar,

    Chennai, Tamilnadu, 600040.

2. Franchy Express Net work Pvt Ltd,

    Creative Communication, CJB 576,

    Koval City, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu.

3. Franch Express Network Pvt. Ltd,

    Home Links Lodge, Kasaragod.

(Ops 1 to 3 exparte)

                                                                        O R D E R

SMT.K.G.BEENA, MEMBER

            The facts of the case is that a parcel was sent by Micro covering  Uppukinar lane, Coimbathur to the complainant through opposite party No.2 on 8-11-2011.  At the time of booking it is informed to him that the parcel will be served to the complainant within 3 days from the date of booking.  The parcel contains guaranteed gold covering items with weight of 11.500 Kg and cost of the articles is  Rs.1,50,000/-.  Opposite parties failed to deliver the parcel as promised and it reached Kasaragod after one month. The deficiency in service on the part of opposite parties caused heavy loss, hardship and mental agony to the complainant.

2.         Notice to opposite parties served.  But they remained absent. Name of opposite parties 1,2 & 3 called absent and set exparte.

3.         Complainant produced Exts A1 to A5 to prove this case. Ext.A1 is a consignment receipt issued by opposite party No.1 to the complainant.  Ext.A5 is the copy of lawyer notice sent by the complainant to opposite party No.2 on 12-03-2012.

4.         Complainant in his affidavit states that he is having a fancy store at Chattanchal and he is self employed.  On 8-11-2011 he purchased guaranteed gold covering ornaments with weight of 11.500 Kg with a cost of  Rs.1,50,000/- from Coimbatore.  After purchasing the gold covering ornaments the complainant packed it and sent through opposite party No.2 to the complainant’s address.  But the parcel was not received by the complainant so far.  Complainant has produced documents Exts A1 to A5  to prove his case. While perusing the affidavit of the complainant and documents we are of the view that this complaint will not stand before this Forum, as the complainant does not fall under the definition of consumer. The word ‘Consumer’ in Sec 2(d) of Consumer Protection Act is well defined in Laxmi Engineering Works V/s PSG   Industrial Institute 1995 RD-SC 211 (4th April 1995) it excludes “ A person who obtain such goods for resale or for any commercial purpose”.  In the light of the discussions made in the above case law this complaint is not maintainable before this Forum.

            In the result, complaint is dismissed with   no order as to costs.

    Sd/-                                               Sd/-                                                      Sd/-

MEMBER                                       MEMBER                                       PRESIDENT

Exts.

A1. 8-11-2011 receipt issued by OP

A2. Returned lawyer notice.

A3. Returned cover

A4. Acknowledgement card.

A5. 12-03-2012 copy of lawyer notice.

 

Sd/-                                                       Sd/-                                                Sd/-

 

MEMBER                                          MEMBER                                     PRESIDENT

Pj/                                                                                Forwarded by Order

 

                                                                        SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. K.T.Sidhiq]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE P.Ramadevi]
Member
 
[HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G.]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.