West Bengal

Murshidabad

CC/80/2018

NAJEL SK - Complainant(s)

Versus

FRANCHISEE MANAGER, SAHARA INDIA PARIWAR - Opp.Party(s)

09 Jul 2019

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Berhampore, Murshidabad.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/80/2018
( Date of Filing : 08 May 2018 )
 
1. NAJEL SK
S/O Late Illiyas Sk, Vill. Chhotkaliai, P.O. Jangipur, P.S. Raghunathganj, Dist. Murshidabad, Pin 742213.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. FRANCHISEE MANAGER, SAHARA INDIA PARIWAR
Jangipur(6153), Raghunathganj Hospital Road, Gate No.1, P.O.and P.S. Raghunathganj, Dist. Murshidabad, Pin 742213.
2. Sector Manager, Sahara India Pariwar
Swarnomayee Bazar, Station Road, PO AND PS Berhampore, Dist Murshidabad, Pin 742101.
3. Zonal Manager, Sahara India Pariwar
Sahara India Sadan, 2A, Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata 700071.
4. Area Manager, Sahara India Pariwar
Sefali Sadan, S. F. Road, PO and PS Siliguri, Dist Darjeeling, Pin 734005.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. ASISH KUMAR SENAPATI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. ALOKA BANDYOPADHYAY MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 09 Jul 2019
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MURSHIDABAD AT BERHAMPORE.

CASE No.CC/80/2018  

 Date of Filing:            08.05.2018                                    Date of Final Order: 09.07.2019

 

Complainant:  Najel Sk

                        S/o Late Illiyas Sk

                        Vill-Chhotkaliai

                        PO-Jangipur

                        PS-Raghunathganj

                        Dist-Murshidabad

                        Pin-742213

-Vs-

Opposite Party:  1.Franchisee Manager,

  Sahara India Pariwar, Jangipur (6153)

  Hospital Road, Gate No. 1,

  PO And PS Raghunathganj,

  Dist Murshidabad, Pin 742225.

 

2. Sector Manager,

Sahara India Pariwar

Swarnomoyee Bazar, Station Road,

PS & PO-Berhampore, Pin- 742101.

 

3. Zonal Manager,

Sahara India Pariwar,

Saraha India Sadan

2A Shakespeare Sarani,

Kolkata- 700071.

 

4. Area Manager,

Sahara India Pariwar

Sefali Sadhan S.F. Road,

 PO- Siliguri,

Pin- 734005

 

 

 

Agent for the Complainant                             :Sri. Md. Mazanoor Rahaman.

Agent/Advocate for the Opposite Party         : Sri. Bidishya Sarkar.

 

                       Present:   Sri Asish  Kumar Senapati………………….......President.                              

                                         Smt. Aloka Bandyopadhyay……………………..Member.

                                     

FINAL ORDER

 Smt. Aloka Bandyopadhyay,Member.

 

This is a complaint under section 12 of the CP Act, 1986.

One  (here in after referred to as the Complainant) filed the case against The Franchisee Manager, Sahara India Pariwar and others (here in after referred to as the OPs) praying for compensation alleging deficiency in service.

 

The sum and substance of the complaint case is as follows:-

            The Complainant deposited Rs.79,000/-, Rs.26,000/-, Rs. 26,000/-, Rs.26,000/- and Rs. 26,000/-  to the OP, Sahara India Pariwar on 31.10.2016  amounting total Rs.1,83,000/- on fixed interest basis and the O.P issued certificate in this regard. The date of maturity of the above certificates was 30.04.18. And the maturity amount was Rs.91,877/-, Rs. 30,238/- , Rs. 30,238/- , Rs. 30,238/- , Rs. 30,238/- respectively against the above deposit. After 30.04.18, the Complainant earnestly requested the OPs to take step for refund of the said respective matured amount considering the certificate issued by them and the Complainant visited the Branch Office several times for refund of the same . But all went in vain. Finding no other alternative the Complainant filed the instant case before this Forum for appropriate relief.

            OPs are contesting the case by filing W/V wherein all material allegations have been denied by them and they asserted that no documents had been filed by the Complainant in respect of  his claim  in spite of repeated demands. They also stated that a case is pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in which all the proceeding of the OP Company has been stayed by the order of the Apex Court and as such they prayed for dismissal of the case.

 

            On the basis of the above version the following points are framed for proper adjudication of the case:

Points for consideration

1. Isthe Complainant a consumer under the provision of the CP Act, 1986?

2. Is the Complainant entitled to get any relief, as prayed for?

 

 

Point Nos. 1 & 2

All the points taken up together for consideration for the sake of convenience and brevity. 

Undoubtedly, the Complainant deposited Rs.79,000/-, Rs.26,000/-, Rs. 26,000/-, Rs.26,000/- and Rs. 26,000/-  to the OP, Sahara India Pariwar on 31.10.2016  amounting total Rs.1,83,000/- on fixed interest basis (vide Annexure 1-5). So, the Complainant is a consumer as per the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

Ld. Advocate for the OP has stated that a case is pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.  But the OPs have not produced any documents in this regard.

It is true that the Complainant on deposited total amount of Rs.1,83,000/- and on 31.10.16 and the OP issued due receipt in this respect considering the deposited amount. So the O.Ps  cannot deny the responsibility to pay the deposited the amount to the complainant as per their agreed condition mentioned  in the certificate issued by them  though  the O.Ps in the w/v stated that  the complainant has not filled any documents in respect of his claim.  

Having gone through the pleadings of the parties and documents filled before us and taking into consideration the arguments put towards by the Complainant and Ld. Advocate for the OPs We are of the opinion that the Complainant is entitled to get the matured amount of Rs.91,877/-, Rs. 30,238/- , Rs. 30,238/- , Rs. 30,238/- , Rs. 30,238/- respectively against the certificate issued by the OPs as the date of maturity in each case was on 30.04.18.

 

Reasons for delay

The Case was filed on 08.05.18 and admitted on 16.05.18. This Forum tried its level best to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible in terms of the provision under section 13(3A) of the CP Act,1986. Delay in disposal of the case has also been explained in the day to day order.

           

In the result, the Consumer case succeeds.

Fees paid are correct. Hence, it is

                             Ordered

that the complaint Case No.CC/80/2018 be and the same is hereby allowed on contest with litigation cost of Rs.1,000/- against the OPs.

                       

The OPs are directed to pay Rs. 91,877/- against the account No. 61536200879, Rs. 30,238/- against the account No. 61536200880, Rs. 30,238/- against the account No. 61536200881, Rs. 30,238/- against the account No. 6153600882 and Rs. 30,238/- against the account No. 61536200883 on production of original documents.

     The O.Ps are directed to pay a litigation  cost of Rs 1000/-.                                            The OPs are further directed to pay Rs.1,000/- as mental pain and agony to the Complainant.

            All the aforesaid orders must be complied within sixty days from the date of this order.

 

Let plain copy of this order  be supplied free of cost, to each of the parties / Ld. Advocate/Agent on record, by hand  /by post under proper acknowledgment  as per rules, for information and necessary action.

The Final Order will also be available in the following Website:

confonet.nic.in

 

 

Dictated & corrected by me.

 

 

Member

 

 Member                                                                                       President.                        

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. ASISH KUMAR SENAPATI]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. ALOKA BANDYOPADHYAY]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.