Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/118/2014

Mrs.Badal Ashok Sethia - Complainant(s)

Versus

Fortis Malar Hospital - Opp.Party(s)

Party in person

18 Mar 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,
CHENNAI (SOUTH)
 
Complaint Case No. CC/118/2014
 
1. Mrs.Badal Ashok Sethia
Nr District Court, GULBARGA-585102.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Fortis Malar Hospital
Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Ch-20.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  B.RAMALINGAM., MA., ML., PRESIDENT
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

                                                                        Date of Filing :   02.12.2013

                                                                        Date of Order :   18.03.2016

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI(SOUTH)

     2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU. B. RAMALINGAM M.A.M.L.,                     : PRESIDENT

                 TMT. K.AMALA, M.A. L.L.B.,                                 : MEMBER I

                 DR. T.PAUL RAJASEKARAN, M.A PGDHRDI, AIII,BCS : MEMBER II

C.C.NO.118/2014

FRIDAY THIS  18TH  DAY OF MARCH 2016

1. Mrs. Badal Ashok Sethia,

1-43/1 Shreyans Marg,

Nr District Court,

GULBARGA 585 102.

 

2. Ashok Parasmal Sethia,

1-43/1, Shreyans Marg,

Nr District Court,

Gulbarga 585 102.                                               ..Complainant s

                                            ..Vs..

The Authorized Signatory,

Fortis Malar Hospital,

No.52, 1st Main Road,

Gandhi Nagar,

Adyar,

Chennai 600 020.                                                   ..Opposite party

For the Complainant                       :   Party in person.    

For the opposite party                     :   M/s. Sathish Parasaran & others

 

          Complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. Complaint is filed seeking direction against the opposite party to refund a sum of Rs.6,40,974/- with interest and also to pay a sum of Rs.6,40,974/- towards compensation and cost of the complaint to the complainants.  

     ORDER

THIRU. B. RAMALINGAM PRESIDENT

 

No representation for complainant, the complainant not come forward to file proof affidavit, inspite of several adjournments,  Hence complainant called absent, this complaint is dismissed for default.  No cost.  

 

 

MEMBER-I                        MEMBER-II                             PRESIDENT.

 
 
[ B.RAMALINGAM., MA., ML.,]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.