Jharkhand

Bokaro

CC/230/2022

Mr. Zishan Ahmad - Complainant(s)

Versus

Flipkart - Opp.Party(s)

Amardeep Jha and Poonam

22 Jul 2023

ORDER

          District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bokaro

Date of Filing-29-12-2022

Date of final hearing-22-07-2023

 Date of Order-22-07-2023

Case No. 230/2022

Mr. Zishan Ahmad S/o Irsad Alam,

 R/o Raja Bazar Govindupur F Bokaro Thermal,

 District- Bokaro, Jharkhand

                                      Vrs.

Flipkart, Building Alyssa, Begonia & Clover, Embassy Tech Village,

Outer Ringh Road, Devarabeesanahalli Village, Bengaluru,

Bangalore, Karnataka 560103

Present:-

                             Shri Jai Prakash Narayan Pandey, President

Shri Bhawani Prasad Lal Das, Sr.Member

                  Smt. Baby Kumari, Member

PER- J.P.N Pandey, President

-:Order:-

  1. Complainant’s case in brief is that he purchased one Plue Mobile Model 10R 5G on 20.05.2022 through Flipkart on Rs. 39,028/-  including shipping charge of Rs. 29/- with invoice. Further case is that said set was received on 23.05.2022 to the complainant but it was found that set is of another brand, old mobile with broken handset for which request for return was made repeatedly but O.P. gave unreasonable and unjustified reasons and failed to return it rather has intentionally blocked the account of the complainant, hence this case has been filed with prayer to direct the O.P. to pay Rs. 39,028/- to the complainant and to pay compensation of Rs. 50,000/- and litigation cost of Rs. 20,000/-.
  2. O.P. appeared and has filed W.S. with assertion that case has been filed by the complainant by suppression of true and material facts with misleading facts in which this O.P. is only intermediary having no role in sale of the article concerned rather seller of the mobile set is “M/s KIAAN Marketing” to whom complainant has not made party. Further reply is that the product was purchased from third party seller, this O.P. never came in possession of the actually ordered product or wrong product at any point of time but without impleading the seller of the product this case has been filed against this O.P. who is not liable at all. As per policy of the company seller is responsible for the deficiency in service if any, hence this case is liable to be dismissed.
  3. Point for determination is whether complainant is entitled to get relief as prayed?
  4. On careful perusal of the papers annexed with the complaint petition it appears that  Annexure –A is the print out of order place,  Annexure-B is request for return of the article, Annexure-C is the closure of the return request and except it there is no any other paper or evidence has been brought on record by the complainant.
  5. Complainant has not produced the tax invoice by which concerned mobile handset was purchased. There is no any evidence on record to prove that the product received was not the same as it was ordered. There is no any evidence on record to prove that the product was found damaged. There is no any evidence of any technical expert to prove about defective handset or the handset supplied was not ordered or damage of the item purchased. In this way this case is liable to be dismissed on these grounds.
  6. It is very much clear that Flipkart is not the seller of the goods rather it is providing  E-marketing platform to the different sellers to sale their products. Since invoice of the article purchased has not been brought on record hence complainant has tried to suppress some material facts. However, by filing W.S. O.P. has disclosed the name of seller but complainant has not taken any attempt to implead the seller as O.P. of the case, who was necessary party to the case. In this way this case is liable to be dismissed on this ground also.
  7. In the result we are of the view that complainant failed to prove his case hence this case is being dismissed with cost.

 

Sd/-

(J.P.N. Pandey)

                                                                                      President

 

Sd/-

(B.P.L Das)

   Sr. Member

                                                                            

                   Sd/-

                                                                               (Baby Kumari)

                                                                                       Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.