Haryana

Karnal

CC/219/2016

Subham Sidher - Complainant(s)

Versus

Flipkart.Com - Flipkart Internet Private Limited - Opp.Party(s)

27 Oct 2016

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

                                                               Complaint no.219 of 2016

                                                               Date of instt.: 27.07.2016

                                                               Date of decision 27.10.2016

Shubham Sidhar son of Shri Nand Lal resident of house no.E 361 Sarafa Bazar Karnal c/o Ravi Sharma resident of house no.1749 Gali no.16 Shayam Nagar Karnal.                                                                                                                                                                                                                            …..Complainant       

                                                Versus

 

1. Flipkart. Com-Flipkart, Internet Pvt. Ltd. Vaishnavi summit ground floor 7^th main, 80 feet road, 3^rd block, koramangala industrial layout Bangalore 560034, Karnataka India.

2. WS Retail Services Pvt. Ltd. no.42 and 43 KACHERANAHALLI village Jaddi Nahli Hobli Hos Court Taluk Banglore Karnataka.

3. Tara Teli Mobile shop no.35 Mela Ram School Market Karnal.

4. Xiaomi Technology India Pvt. Ltd. 380 Belerica road sri city siddam agraharam village Vartadaiahpalem mandal chittoor district Andhara Pradesh-517541.

 

                                                                             ….Opposite parties.

 

                             Complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.

 

Before            Sh.K.C.Sharma……….President.

 Sh.Anil Sharma…….Member.

 

Present:-        Complainant in person.

                     Shri Abhay Saini Advocate for opposite parties no.1 and 2

                    Opposite party no.3 exparte.

                    Shri Dheeraj Sachdeva Advocate for opposite party no.4                  

ORDER:

                   Learned counsel of opposite party no.4 made statement that the opposite parties are ready to replace the mobile set in question with new one Redme Note-3 within 15 days. Thereafter, complainant made statement that he deposited the original job sheet with the opposite party no.4. Hence, he does not want to pursue with the present complaint and wants to withdraw the same. Statements of both the parties recorded separately.

                   In view of that the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, both the parties shall be bound by their respective statements. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.  

Announced
Dated:27.10.2016.

                                                                         (K.C.Sharma)

                                                                             President,

                                                                   District Consumer Disputes

                                                                    Redressal Forum, Karnal.

                             (Anil Sharma ) 

                                Member.