Haryana

Karnal

CC/504/2023

Bhanu Pratap - Complainant(s)

Versus

Flipkart Internet Private Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Ms. Sarita Singh

19 Sep 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint No.504 of 2023

                                                          Date of instt.12.09.2023

                                                          Date of Decision: 19.09.2024

 

Bhanu Pratap son of Shri Virender Chopra, resident of H.No.318, Sector-9, Part-2, Karnal, Haryana.

 

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

1. Flipkart Internet Private Limited, Buildings Alyssa, Begonia and Clove Embassy Tech Village, Outer Ring Road, Devarabeesanahalli Village, Bengaluru 560103, Karnataka, India.
2. Dhara Enterprises, 37/1/4/2/1, H.No.617, Opposite Neelam Metal, Pisoli Road, Pisoli Pune, Maharashtra 411048 and Dhara Enterprises, Shop No.4, 1248, Shukwarpeth, Pune, Maharashtra, Pune 411002.                                                                                                        ....Opposite parties.

 

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Mrs.Neeru Agarwal……..Member

                Mrs. Sarvjeet Kaur…………Member

                               

Present:   None for the Complainant.

                Shri Pawandeep Kalyana, counsel for the OP No.1.

                OP No.2 given up.

                                                 

               Today the case is fixed evidence of complainant. None has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 03:40 PM. No further wait is justified.

                   A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OP on 20.11.2023. The complainant has availed several effective opportunities for leading his evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint. Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission.

                   Hence, in view the above facts the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated: 19.09.2024.          

                President, 

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

  (Neeru Agarwal)              (Saravjeet Kaur) 

Member                           Member