Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/224/2024

Abhiram A S - Complainant(s)

Versus

FIT ARC Fitness Hub - Opp.Party(s)

08 Nov 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/224/2024
( Date of Filing : 25 Mar 2024 )
 
1. Abhiram A S
Nadakkadu,Naruvamoodu,tvpm
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. FIT ARC Fitness Hub
kannanmoola,Tvpm
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 08 Nov 2024
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

C.C.No.224/2024 Filed on 25/03/2024

ORDER DATED: 08/11/2024

 

Complainant

:

Abhiram.A.S., S/o.Sreekala.D, Kumaramangalam, Nadukkadu, Naruvamoodu.P.O., Thiruvananthapuram – 695 528.

                      (Party in person)

Opposite party

:

The Authorised Signatory, FIT ARC Fitness Hub, Kollur Road, Kannammoola, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 011.

 

ORDER

 

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

This is a complaint filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter the commission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party.  After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite party to appear before this Commission on 03/06/2024.  The notice issued to the opposite party was returned with endorsement “no such addressee”.  Subsequently the complainant was directed to take steps against the opposite party and the case was adjourned to this date.  When the case came up for consideration today the complainant filed a memo stating that he is not willing to further proceed with this complaint, in view of his recent job transfer.  The memo filed by the complainant is accepted and recorded.  In view of the memo filed by the complainant, we find that this is fit case to be dismissed.

In the result the complaint is dismissed as not pressed.  There will be no order as to cost.

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 08th  day of November,  2024.

 

            Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN                 : PRESIDENT 

 

          Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR              : MEMBER    

 

         Sd/-

                                                                 VIJU V.R                          : MEMBER

                                                                                     

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.