Delhi

South Delhi

CC/779/2006

Colonel S K Tomar - Complainant(s)

Versus

FIIT-JEET LTD - Opp.Party(s)

31 Oct 2015

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23
QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016
 
Complaint Case No. CC/779/2006
 
1. Colonel S K Tomar
115 engineer regiment pin 91115
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. FIIT-JEET LTD
ICE HOUSE 29A KALU SARAI SARVA PRIYA VIHAR NEW DELHI 110016
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N K GOEL PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. NAINA BAKSHI MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
none
 
For the Opp. Party:
none
 
ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II

Udyog Sadan, C-22 & 23, Qutub Institutional Area

(Behind Qutub Hotel), New Delhi-110016.

 

Case No.779/2006

Colonel S K Tomar

Commanding Officer

115 Engineer Regiment

Pin-914115                                       

C/O 99 APO                                                        ……Complainant 

Versus

1.       The Managing Director

          FIIT JEE Ltd.

          ICE House

          29A Kalu Sarai, Sarva Priya Vihar

          New Delhi-110016.

 

2.       The Coordinator

          FIIT JEE, SCO-7, 3rd Floor,

          Distt. Shopping Centre

          ‘B’ Block, Ranjeet Avenue

          Amritsar.                                                     ……Opposite Parties

 

 

                                                          Date of Institution          : 11.12.06                                                            Date of Order        : 31.10.15

Coram:

Sh. N.K. Goel, President

Ms. Naina Bakshi, Member

                  

O R D E R

According to the complainant, his daughter (aged 16 years) joined two years class room programme of coaching at Coaching Center of the OP-2 in the month of August 2005 and the complainant paid Rs. 76,589/- as fee for two years.  However, the daughter of the complainant was not able to cope with the curriculum of the two years programme for her personal reasons and, hence, the complainant met the Coordinator at OP-2 Center twice and told him that he wanted to withdraw his daughter at that stage and requested him to refund the fee but the Coordinator refused to refund the balance fee as his daughter had already attended about one year course.  When nothing happened despite writing a letter in June 2006, the complainant has filed the present complaint for directing the OPs to refund an amount of Rs. 38,294/- being the balance of the fee along with interest @ 18% p.a. w.e.f. the date of deposit and to pay Rs. 50,000/- as compensation  and cost of litigation.

        In the reply, the OP has inter-alia stated that the complainant as well as his daughter while seeking admission/registration with the OP, had understood the enrolment form and declarations contained therein and signed the same after understanding the terms and conditions and, hence, the complainant is not entitled to any refund.    Reliance has been placed on Paras 5, 6, 10, 14 & 15 of the relevant declarations in the Enrolment Form, which read as under:

“Para 5:       I understand that if I leave the institute                         before completing the full course for any                        reason whatsoever, including transfer of                      parents/guardians/ill health of self or any                    other member of the family or my admission                 in any institute/engineering college etc., or                    my studentship is cancelled because of                      misconduct etc.  I or my parents/guardian                    shall have no claim for refund of fees.

Para 6:        In addition to the above, I understand                           without any ambiguity that the fee once                         paid is not refundable at all, whatever the                        reasons be.

Para 10:      I promise to abide by all rules and                                 regulations of FIITJEE declaration, in letter           and spirit.

Para 14:      I/we, the parent/guardian and/or the                           student, severally and jointly declare that                          I/we have read and understood at all                         clauses contained in the Declaration on                         Enrolment Form and agree to abide by them                 without any reservation or ambiguity.

Para 15:      I/We further declare that the above named                    student is taking admission in the FIITJEE                 having considered everything material, on                         his own sweet will after giving due                                 consideration to rigours of time, distance                       and studies ahead and with the permission                   of the parent/guardian without any coercion                    from any side.”

It is stated that after perusing these declarations and the consent accorded thereto by the complainant and his daughter, complainant is not entitled to any relief.  It is prayed that the  complaint be dismissed.

           Complainant has filed his affidavit in evidence.  On the other hand, affidavit of Sh. Ashish Kr. Aggarwal, Manager-HRD has been filed in evidence on behalf of the OP.

          Written arguments have been filed on behalf of the parties.

          We have heard the counsel for the OP and have also carefully gone through the record.

          Nowhere in the reply the OP has stated that it is not an educational institution nor has this fact been stated in the affidavit of the OP’s witness.

          The copy of the Enrolment Form of the complainant is Ex. OP-3.  It contains the important information for the students/Parents/Local Guardians. It also contains the above  reproduced Paras 5, 6, 10, 14 & 15.  The Enrolment Form has been signed by the complainant and his father.  Therefore, in our considered opinion, the complainant is bound by the terms and conditions contained in the Enrolment Form.  Law laid down in Mayank Tiwari Vs. FIIT JEE Ltd. (MANU/CF/0848/2014) applies to the present case. If it is so, the complainant is not entitled to claim the amount of fee.

          In view of the above discussion, we dismiss the complaint leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

           Let a copy of this order be sent to the parties as per regulation 21 of the Consumer Protection Regulations.  Thereafter file be consigned to record room.

  

(NAINA BAKSHI)                                                              (N. K. GOEL)        MEMBER                                                                  PRESIDENT

 

Announced on  31.10.15.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.10.2015

Present –   None.

          Vide our separate order of even date pronounced, the complaint is dismissed.    Let the file be consigned to record room.

 

(NAINA BAKSHI)                                                (N.K. GOEL)    MEMBER                                                               PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N K GOEL]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. NAINA BAKSHI]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.