Kerala

Kozhikode

CC/121/2014

USHA .T.K - Complainant(s)

Versus

FASHION BAZAR - Opp.Party(s)

24 May 2014

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE
 
Complaint Case No. CC/121/2014
 
1. USHA .T.K
LALBHAVAN, 8/2 CHELANNUR,KOZHIKODE-673616
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. FASHION BAZAR
UDUPI HOME HALL,MM ALI ROAD,PALAYAM, KOZHIKODE-673002
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONOURABLE MR. G Yadunadhan, BA.,LLB., PRESIDENT
 HONOURABLE MR. L Jyothikumar, LLB., Member
 HON'BLE MRS. BEENA JOSEPH MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOZHIKODE.

C.C.121/2014

Dated this the 24th day of May 2014.

 

            ( Present:  Sri. G. Yadunadhan, B.A., LLB.                            :  President)                     

                             Sri. L. Jyothikumar, B.A., LLB.                              :  Member

                             Smt.Beena Joseph, M.A                                       : Member

 

ORDER

By G.Yadunadhan, President:

            The case of the complainant is that complainant had purchased a saree for Rs.950/- from the opposite party’s shop.  After the first use, complainant washed the saree the colour of the saree had gone.  This was intimated to the opposite party.  Opposite party was not responded.  So complainant seeking relief against opposite party directed them to refund the bill amount and also pay compensation of Rs.10,000/-

            Opposite party after serving notice entered in appearance and offered settlement in the beginning itself, but complainant was not present.  Hence case is posted for reporting settlement on 23.05.2014.  Unfortunately on that day also complainant  was absent.  Hence the case was taken for order.

Points for consideration.

  1. Whether any deficiency of service on the part of opposite party?
  2. Whether Complainant is entitled to get any compensation from the opposite party? If so what is the relief and cost.

Complainant was continuously absent for the last 2 consecutive postings, opposite party was present in all the postings and offered settlement, hence case adjourn to settlement on 23.05.2014, on that day also complainant was not turned up. Since the complainant could not appear before this Fora, Fora  can not decide and report the settlement.  Opposite party was present in all postings, and complainant deliberately absent.  Fora  has not in a position to allowing the complaint in favour of the complainant.  Hence complaint is liable to be dismissed without any cost.

Pronounced in the open court this the 24th day of May 2014

Date of filing 06.03.2014.

SD/-PRESIDENT                                  SD/-MEMBER                          SD/-MEMBER

//True copy//

 (  Forwarded/By Order)

 

SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 
 
[HONOURABLE MR. G Yadunadhan, BA.,LLB.,]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONOURABLE MR. L Jyothikumar, LLB.,]
Member
 
[HON'BLE MRS. BEENA JOSEPH]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.