Orissa

Jharsuguda

CC/37/2018

Smt. Pratima Devi W/O- Sitram Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Executive Engineer Electrical,(WESCO) - Opp.Party(s)

Self

12 Sep 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM JHARSUGUDA.
ODISHA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/37/2018
( Date of Filing : 06 Apr 2018 )
 
1. Smt. Pratima Devi W/O- Sitram Singh
AT- Lecture Colony Beheramal,Po-O.M.P Line ,PS- Jharsuguda
Jharsuguda
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Executive Engineer Electrical,(WESCO)
Behermal, Jharsuguda
Jharsuguda
Odisha
2. S.D.O. Electrical (WESCO)Jharsuguda
Pahadi Mandir,Jharsuguda
Jharsuguda
Odisha
3. Jr.Engineer(WESCO)
Section-III,Near S.D.J.M. Court Beheramal
Jharsuguda
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. ANAMIKA NANDA PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. SANTOSH KUMAR OJHA MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 12 Sep 2018
Final Order / Judgement

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, JHARSUGUDA

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT CASE NO. 37 OF 2018

Pratima Devi,

W/O: Sitaram Singh,

RO: Lectures Colony, Beheramal, PO: OMP Line,

PS/Dist- Jharsuguda, Odisha…………………..……………………..…..……. Complainant.

     

                                           Versus 

 

  1. Executive Engineer, WESCO,

Beheramal, Jharsuguda.

 

  1. Sub Divisional Officer, WESCO,

Pahadi Mandir, Jharsuguda.

 

  1. Jr. Engineer, WESCO,

Section-III, Near S.D.J.M Court, Beheramal,

Dist: Jharsugufda, Odisha................................................................ Opp. Parties.

 

 

Counsel for the Parties:-

For the Complainant                                              Self.

For the Opp. Parties                                              B.B. Barai, Adv. & Associates.

 

Date of Order: 12.09.2018

 

Present

                                                                                   1. Shri Santosh Kumar Ojha, Member.

                                                                                   2. Smt. Anamika Nanda, Member(W).

 

Shri Santosh Kumar Ojha, Member :- The  brief facts of the complaint case is that, the complainant has taken electrical connection with having Consumer No. 413123030607 and she was paying the electricity bills regularly to the O.Ps. In the month of February, 2016 a person from electric department came to the house of complainant and objected for cello-tap which the complainant had put on electric wire connecting the electric meter and to hide the issue he asked for a bribe of Rs.10,000/- only which the complainant could not paid.  The complainant was forced to put a signature on a paper.  When the complainant asked on the matter that person threatened her in some filthy language.  After getting signature he went up and since the month onwards the O.Ps. sending arrear bill of Rs.27,303/- only till date.  The complainant is paying the average bill of Rs.200/- to 250/- only. The complainant being an old lady (63 years) while paying the current electric bill the O.Ps. denied to receive the same and continuing arrear bill amount, hence this case.

 

                On notice of complaint the O.Ps appeared but failed to file their written version even after providing sufficient opportunities and stand ex-parte.

After ex-parte hearing from the complainant the case posted for further hearing on the next date fixed and on the said next date the Advocate for the O.Ps just filed their written version along with relevant documents without any pray to be considered. Copies served to the complainant. The complainant orally objected strongly for filing of such documents at this stage. Thus as per the settled principles of law the said documents alongwith written version has got no meaning at all for the present circumstance of the case.  

 

As per submission of the complainant and her documents it is found that, she is an old senior citizen lady having consumer No. 413123030607, was / is paying the electricity bills regularly as per her electricity energy consumption. All of sudden a person said to be from O.Ps side came to the house of complainant in the month of May 2016 and objected on the cello tape which was put on the service wire of complainant and asked for bribe of Rs.10,000/- only to hide the matter by putting some documents to sign forcefully.  While denying to sign by the complainant the said person started behaving in unusual languages. On the next month onwards the complainant received arrear bill of Rs.27,303/- only excluding regular bills. The complainant requested to omit the arrear amount and paying the regular bills. But the O.Ps did not respond.

 

Generally manipulation in the service wire is not possible on the part of a lay man without support of any technician or any line man or any authority of the O.Ps. Department. If it is so then the O.Ps are also equally liable for such misconducted activities. On the abovementioned circumstance the O.Ps are liable for their behavior towards the complainant and are found to be deficient in their service.

 

Hence the complaint petition is hereby allowed with directions to the O.Ps to receive the regular electricity bills from the complainant and waive out the entire penal charges imposed on the complainant by issuing afresh electricity bill onwards and further directed to change the service wire of complainant having without any fault on it within 30 (thirty) days from the date of receipt of this order.   

 

Accordingly the case in hand is disposed of.

Order pronounced in the open court today the 12th day of September 2018. Free copy of this order be communicated to the concerned parties as per rule. 

          I Agree.                             

                                         

  1. Nanda, Member( W)                                                      S.K.Ojha, Member       

                                     Dictated and corrected by me

 

        S.K.Ojha, Member       

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. ANAMIKA NANDA]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. SANTOSH KUMAR OJHA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.