Bharat Chandra Rout filed a consumer case on 29 Dec 2015 against Executive Engineer,Electrical in the Jajapur Consumer Court. The case no is CC/65/2015 and the judgment uploaded on 15 Jan 2016.
IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, JAJPUR.
Present: 1.Shri Biraja Prasad Kar, President
2.Sri Pitabas Mohanty, Member,
3.Miss Smita Ray, Lady Member.
Dated the 29th day of December,2015.
C.C.Case No.65 of 2015
Bharat Chandra Rout S/O Late Gayadhar Rout
At/P.O/P.S/ Mangalpur,
Dist.-Jajpur. …… ……....Complainant . .
(Versus)
1.The Executive Engineer,Electrical Jajpur.
2.S.D.O,Electrical,Dasarathpur,At/P.O/Dasarathpur,P.S.Mangalpur,Dist.Jajpur.
3.J.E,Electrical,Dasarathpur,At/P.O/Dasarathpur,P.S.Mangalpur,Dist.Jajpur. . …………………..Opp.Parties.
For the Complainant: Sri R.K. Mishra, Sri P.K. Rout, Sri S.N. Rana, Advocates.
For the Opp.Parties : Self.
Date of order: 29. 12. 2015.
SHRI PITABAS MOHANTY, MEMBER .
The petitioner has filed the present dispute alleging deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps.
The facts relevant for the present dispute as per complaint petition shortly are that the petitioner is a domestic consumer under the O.Ps. having consumer No.M11695D. The petitioner paying the electrical dues regularly.
That suddenly the O.Ps without any reason enhanced the constant demand from 1K.W to 2K.W and demanded excess amount in the monthly electricity bill. Thereafter the petitioner approached the O.Ps. through registered letter regarding correction of inflated bill and reduce the contact demand. But the O.Ps. without paying any heed to it remained silent.
Accordingly finding no other way the petitioner has filed the present dispute with the prayer necessary direction may be issued for reduce the load from 2K.W to 1 K.W and to revise the inflated bill.
After notices the O.Ps. have appeared and filed their written version . The O.Ps. have taken the following defence:
That the petitioner is a domestic consumer bearing consumer No.M11695D (6122/2212/0294) with C.D 2K.W .
The petitioner is a regular consumer and paying electricity bill as per last ledger.
The billing of the consumer is done as per meter ( actual) basis.
Connected demand on the date of verification on dt.05.08.15 is found. Verification sheet duly accepted by the petitioner is found . 1.825 K.W is enclosed.
Ledger copy of the petitioner is enclosed for reference. Hence, the case may be dismissed on merit.
In view of the above pleadings we have perused the record along with documents and ledger copy filed from the side of the O.Ps that the energy charges has been assessed on average basis for some months ,which is contrary to regulation-86 and 93(8) of OERC Code-2004 and the load enhanced has been done as proper verification of the premises of the petitioner by the O.Ps.
In the above observation from our side we dispose of the dispute as per the order given below.
O R D E R
In the net result the dispute is disposed of. The O.Ps. are directed to revise the provisional / load factor bill as mentioned in the ledger copy as per section -97 of the OERC Code-2004 within three months after receipt of the order . No cost.
This order is pronounced in the open Forum on this the 29th day of December,2015. under my hand and seal of the Forum.
(Shri Biraja Prasad Kar) (Shri Pitabas Mohanty)
President. Member.
Typed to my dictation & corrected by me
(Miss Smita Ray)
Member. (Shri Pitabas Mohanty)
Member.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.