Smt. Suprava Panda filed a consumer case on 26 Jul 2022 against Executive Engineer (WESCO Utility) in the Sambalpur Consumer Court. The case no is CC/9/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 28 Jul 2022.
PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SAMBALPUR
Consumer.Case No.- 9/2016
Present-Dr. Ramakanta Satapathy, President,
Sri. Sadananda Tripathy, Member
Smt. Suprava Panda,
W/O- Premananda Panda
R/O-Bariha Temple Lane, Jharuapara , Sambalpur
Po-Jharuapada, PS-Town, Dist-Sambalpur,
At present At-19/603, Eastend Apartment, Mayur Vihar, Phase-I,
Extention, New Delhi-110096 …..Complainant
Vrs.
Electrical Division (WESCO Utility), Sambalpur.
At/Po-Ainthapali, Ps-Ainthapali,
Dist-Sambalpur.
At/PO/Ps-Burla, Dist-Sambalpur.
S.E.D. Sambalpur, Office At Jagannath Colony,
Near Rabindra Kalyan Mandap, Sambalpur.
Po/Ps-Ainthapali, Dist-Sambalpur. ….Opp. Parties
Counsels:-
DATE OF HEARING : 04.07.2022 DATE OF JUDGEMENT : 26.07.2022
Presented by Dr. Ramakanta Satapathy, PRESIDENT:
The Complainant further submitted that the O.Ps did not provide electrical connection despite repeated approach. The ministerial staff of the O.Ps demanded Rs. 10,000/- to-wards gratification for the connection.
All of a sudden the O.Ps made unlawful demand of Rs. 1,09.659/- finding unauthorized connection in the house, directed to deposit the demanded preliminary assessment amount within 7 days of receipt of the letter. Second time inspection shown on 21.09.2015 the report is fabricated and planted. The O.Ps have not yet supplied power to the Complainant.
Being aggrieved the complainant filed this complaint.
On 21.09.2015 during routine checking found 25 no.s of person including complaint of Brijdham housing society availing power supply directly without meter from the panel board for which provision Assessment was prepared against all the persons. The Complainant had applied of 8 K.W. Domestic load on 24.06.2015. Permission letter was issued vide letter dated 17.08.2015 wherein power supply agreement was a condition. The Complainant failed to execute the agreement. As the Complainant is not a valid consumer of the O.P., the complaint is not maintainable. The O.Ps are not deficient in their service. The produce of assessment against the Complainant has been issued rightly. The Complaint is liable to be dismissed.
Relating to submission of Agreement tussle between Complainant and O.P. NO.1 & 2 is very clear from the case record. As per order dated 21.09.2017 of the forum, Agreement was submitted by Complainant and the O.P. No.1 was directed to execute the same as per law within the period of 30 days from the side of the O.P.
Regarding proceeding u/s 126 with sec.135 of the Electricity Act. this Forum/Commission has no jurisdiction to waive out the demand of the O.P. No.1. The Complainant is at liberty to redress her grievance before the appropriate Court of law.
With aforesaid observation the case is disposed of
Order pronounced in open court on 26th day of July 2022.
Supply free copies to the parties.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.