Kerala

Malappuram

CC/212/2012

MOIDUTTY HAJI .K.M (75Yrs) - Complainant(s)

Versus

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY - Opp.Party(s)

ADV. P.C. GIRISH

30 Mar 2015

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
MALAPPURAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/212/2012
 
1. MOIDUTTY HAJI .K.M (75Yrs)
S/O .ALAVIKUTTYHAJI,KILIYAMANNIL HOUSE,PERINGOTUPULAM,PAZHAMALOOR .PO
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
KERALAWATER AUTHORITY,MALAPPURAM
MALAPPURAM
KERALA
2. VILLEGE OFFICER
KODUR .PO
MALAPPURAM
3. DEPUTY THAHASILDAR
REVENEW RECOVARY,PERITHALMANNA
MALAPPURAM
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. MOHAMMEDALI K PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. MADANAVALLY RK MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. MINI MATHEW MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

By Miss. R. K. Madanavally, Member,

 

Facts in brief:-

  1. The complainant herein is a Senior Citizen aged more than 75 years old.

  2. The complainant is possessing two quarters which are constructed more than 30 years back. The complainant had applied for the water connection. Though the pipe was fitted, there was no water in it but only seen the 'air'. Opposite party No.1 convinced the complainant that there is Air Pressure in the pipe and they are going to put up a machine on the pipe line.

  3. Even after the above promise, the complainant did not get the water and the complainant had decided to cancel the water connection. There after the meter and connection were by the opposite party No.1 and at the time of disconnection opposite party No.1 informed the complainant that he will receive the refund amount if any. The complainant had applied for the water connection more than 22 years back. There after he is having no water connection under opposite party.

  4. While so the opposite party No.2 and 3 initiated Revenue Recovery proceedings against the complainant by sending a demand notice for an amount of Rs.47,776/- dated, 30-07-2012 as per the direction of opposite party No.1. Thereafter the complainant approached the opposite party No.1 and they informed that they had committed a mistake and directed the complainant to file a petition for requesting the withdrawal of the notice. Thereafter the complainant made a request before the opposite party No.1 but it was of no avail. Hence this complaint.

  5. The opposite party No.1, in their written version admitted that they had given a connection tot he complainant before 10 years. According to them the complainant is holding the residential quarters of Building No.1/250 to 1/269. Though there is a well in the premise it is not in a condition to use. The whole residents in the quarters are using the water provided by the Water Authority. The opposite party No.1 had not received any complaint from the complainant that he is not getting the water. If the meter is testing, one was find out that the complainant is using the water by using the above connection.

  6. After receiving the water connection, the complainant had not paid any single amount towards opposite party No.1. So they issued a notice dated, 10-02-03. But the complainant was not ready to pay the amount. Thereafter on 30-12-2010, another notice was issued for an amount of Rs.38,425/- and the consumer connection was disconnected. Even after, the disconnection,t he complainant was not willing to pay

Dated this 21st day of January, 2015.

     

    K. MOHAMMED ALI, PRESIDENT

    R. K. MADANAVALLY, MEMBER

    MINI MATHEW, MEMBER

     

     

     

    APPENDIX

     

     

    Witness examined on the side of the complainant : Nil

    Documents marked on the side of the complainant : Nil

    Witness examined on the side of the opposite parties : Nil

    Documents marked on the side of the opposite parties : Nil

     

    K. MOHAMMED ALI, PRESIDENT

    R. K. MADANAVALLY, MEMBER

    MINI MATHEW, MEMBER

     
     
    [HON'BLE MR. MOHAMMEDALI K]
    PRESIDENT
     
    [HON'BLE MS. MADANAVALLY RK]
    MEMBER
     
    [HON'BLE MRS. MINI MATHEW]
    MEMBER

    Consumer Court Lawyer

    Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

    Bhanu Pratap

    Featured Recomended
    Highly recommended!
    5.0 (615)

    Bhanu Pratap

    Featured Recomended
    Highly recommended!

    Experties

    Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

    Phone Number

    7982270319

    Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.