By Sri. A.S. Subhagan, Member:-
This is a complaint filed under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986.
2. Facts of the case:- The Complainant is a consumer of the 1st Opposite Party, and is having a domestic water connection in his house since years, with consumer connection No. MNT/1330D. The consumption of water from the water authority connection is very less as the Complainant and three other families have a well as the main source of water usage. But still the Complainant pays the amount of water charge in advance and has no dues to the Opposite Party.
3. On 15.04.2016 the Complainant received a bill from the Opposite Party for an amount of Rs.9,258/- with interest to be paid and thereafter received another bill dated 07.06.2020 for an amount of Rs.10,232/- to be paid by the Complainant. The Complainant had paid the water charges for an amount of Rs.200/- for the bill dated 10.12.2015 just before receiving the above mentioned bills and he never kept any amount as balance towards his payments for consuming water from the authority. On receipt of the two bills the Complainant was shocked and went to the office of water authority and as per their direction on 20.06.2016 had filed a petition before the Executive Engineer, Water Authority, Mananthavady stating the exorbitant amount for which notice was sent to him by the 1st Opposite Party. On receipt of the request of the Complainant the officials from Water Authority checked the meter and found it faulty. At the time of inspection when the meter was checked and found it faulty. At the time of inspection when the meter was checked water flow was disconnected but the meter was working even with the passage of air so it was understood and was admitted by the 1st Opposite party that the meter was faulty. Seeing the faulty meter the 1st Opposite Party had assured to take necessary action for which the Complainant waited but as he received no communication or reply from the 1st Opposite Party and as the 1st Opposite Party was convinced that the meter was faulty he was under the impression that the said bills were cancelled and as the faulty meter was not rectified he had disconnected the said water connection also.
4. To the shock of the Complainant, after two years of disconnection of the water connection he received a notice numbered as A2-110/2010(RR) dated 27.02.2016 from the 2nd Opposite Party, The Assistant Executive Engineer, Kerala Water Authority, P.H. Division, Sulthan Bathery stating that an amount of Rs.10,460/- is due to be paid by him towards payment of usage of water and if not paid within 15 days Revenue Recovery proceedings will be initiated against him. On receipt of the notice the Complainant had sent a letter stating all facts to all the three Opposite Parties but none has replied till this date.
5. The above bills and notice are erroneous as the Complainant is not liable to pay the amount as the Complainant had not used water to that quantity and the meter was faulty which was understood and admitted by the 1st Opposite Party at the time of inspection who had assured to change it to the Complainant but had not done due to which the Complainant had disconnected the water connection. The Complainant is not liable to pay any amount as claimed in the bills and notice. The bills and notice issued to the Complainant for Rs.9,258/-, Rs.10,232/- and Rs.10,460/- are illegal and erroneous.
6. The Complainant is not liable to pay the amount mentioned in the said bills and notice as he had not used water as per the bills and notice. Moreover the act of claiming an amount after realizing that the meter was faulty and that the Complainant had not consumed the said quantity of water and also without replying or responding to the petitions and the letters of the Complainant amounts to gross deficiency of service by the Opposite Party. Due to the illegal action of the Opposite Parties the Complainant has suffered mentally to a tune of Rs.25,000/- which the Opposite parties are liable to pay to the complainant as compensation.
7. In view of the above facts the Complainant has approached this Commission with the following prayers in the complaint.
- Declaring the Bill dated 15.04.2016 for Rs.9,258/- in consumer connection No.MNT/1330/D, Bill dated 14.06.2016 for Rs.10,232/- in consumer connection No.MNT/1330/D and Notice No.A2-110/2010 Dated 27.02.2019 in consumer connection No.MNT/1330/D as illegal, null and void and that the Complainant is not liable to pay the bill amounts and the notice amount of Rs.10,460/-.
- Directing the Opposite Parties not to initiate revenue recovery proceedings on the basis of above bill.
- To pay a compensation of Rs.25,000/- to the Complainant for the mental agony and distress caused to him due to the illegal action of the Opposite Parties.
- To pass such other or further reliefs as the Complainant prays for and this Hon’ble Forum deems fit to grant.
8. Commission registered the complaint and notices were served upon the
Opposite Parties but they did not appear and therefore they were set exparte. The complainant appeared and chief affidavit was filed. Exts.A1 to A6 were marked from his side and he was examined as PW1. Ext. A1 is the notice issued by the Opposite Party on 15.12.2015, Ext. A2 is the notice issued on 15.04.2016, Ext. A3 is the notice issued on 14.06.2016, Ext. A4 is the notice, issued on 27.02.2019, Ext. A5 is the complaint application submitted by the Complainant and Ext. A6 is the letter submitted by the Complainant to the Opposite Party. In spite of Exts. A5 and A6 were submitted to the Opposite Parties they were not seen responded. The Opposite Parties had the Opportunity to appear before the Commission and to contest the case. But they even didn’t care to appear. On a careful scrutiny of Exts.A1 to A6 the Commission is of the view that the Complainant’s case is genuine one. Issue of unreasonable bills to a customer by the Opposite Party without any sustaining grounds and taking action without redressing his grievance as per Ext.A5 and A6 notices amount to unfair trade practice/ deficiency in service on the part of the Opposite Party. Therefore the complainant is entitled to get relief as prayed for but the compensation claimed by the Complainant is exorbitant.
In the result, the complaint is partly allowed and the Opposite Parties are directed to
- Not take or initiate any revenue recovery proceedings on the basis of Exts. A2, A3 and A4 notices against the Complainant as the Commission declares Exts.A2, A3 and A4 as illegal, null and void and
- Pay a compensation of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) which shall be paid by the Opposite Parties jointly and severally to the Complainant for the mental agony and distress caused to him due to the illegal action of the Opposite Parties against the Complainant, within one month from the date of this order failing which the Complainant shall have the right to recover the amount together with interest @ 8% per annum from the date of this order by due process of law.
Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by him and corrected by
me and Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 14th day of July 2022.
Date of filing:02.11.2020.
PRESIDENT: Sd/-
MEMBER : Sd/-
MEMBER : Sd/-
APPENDIX.
Witness for the complainant:
PW1. Siva Kumar. Complainant.
Witness for the Opposite Party:
Nil.
Exhibits for the complainant:
A1. Copy of Demand and Disconnection Notice. dt:10.12.2015.
A2. Copy of Demand and Disconnection Notice. dt:06.04.2016.
A3. Demand and Disconnection Notice. dt:07.06.2016.
A4. Notice. dt:27.02.2019.
A5. Copy of Application. dt:20.06.2016.
A6. Copy of Letter. dt:29.03.2019.
Exhibit for the Opposite Party:
Nil.