Orissa

Kalahandi

CC/7/2022

Manjula Palei aged about 48 years. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Executive Engineer Kalahandi East Electrical Division - Opp.Party(s)

Sushir Kumar Pattnaik & Associates

23 Feb 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KALAHANDI
NEAR TV CENTRE PADA, BHAWANIPATANA, KALAHANDI
ODISHA, PIN 766001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/7/2022
( Date of Filing : 04 Mar 2022 )
 
1. Manjula Palei aged about 48 years.
W/o Dhruba Charan Palei, Ashasagar Pada, At /Po/Ps Bhawanipatna Dist-Kalahandi,Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Executive Engineer Kalahandi East Electrical Division
TPWODL,Bhawanipatna At/Po/Ps-Telgubangti Pada,Bhawanipatna
2. Sub Divisionbal Officer ,Section-2
TPWODL,At-Naktiguda, Po/Ps-Bhawanipatna Dist-Kalahandi,Odisha
3. The Junior Engineer, Electrical ,TPWODL
At-Naktiguda, Po/Ps-Bhawanipatna Dist-Kalahandi,Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Aswini Kumar Patra PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sudhakar Senapothi MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Sushir Kumar Pattnaik & Associates, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 23 Feb 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Case Record taken up for hearing. Complainant is present on call. Complainant has submitted a memo stating therein that  as per interim order passed in their case  electricity has been reinstated. The memo is taken into record. Ops are absent on call.

Perused the materials available on record. It is found that the complainant has alleged deficiency of service on the part of the Ops for disconnection of electricity to her premises demanding arrear bill without giving prior intimation to her .

The complainant has prayed for an order directing the Ops to restore electric supply  to her house and for an award  of compensation of Rs.10,000/- towards mental agony suffered due to such disconnection of electric supply.

It is found that order dt.15.03.2022 was passed directing the Ops to restore electric supply to the complainant’s premises  and as per the memo filed by the complainant today it is ascertained that the relief  claimed in the original complaint petition has already been availed by the complainant . No evidence is adduced by the complainant to prove any deficiency of service or unfair trade practice on the part of the Ops. Hence, this complaint  got no merit. Accordingly dismissed against the Ops. However, no order  as to costs. Petition if any pending is disposed of accordingly.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Aswini Kumar Patra]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sudhakar Senapothi]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.