Uttar Pradesh

Aligarh

CC/10/2022

RAJENDRA SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

EXECUTIVE ENGGNIER ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION DIVISION IV - Opp.Party(s)

19 Jun 2023

ORDER

न्यायालय जिला उपभोक्ता विवाद प्रतितोष आयोग
अलीगढ
 
Complaint Case No. CC/10/2022
( Date of Filing : 14 Jan 2022 )
 
1. RAJENDRA SINGH
S/O LATE SRI TULARAM PRESENT R/O GIRRAJ NAGAER GG COLD STORES KE PICHE IGLAS GONDA ROAD ALIGARH
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. EXECUTIVE ENGGNIER ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION DIVISION IV
IGLAS ALIGARH
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. HASNAIN QURESHI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. ALOK UPADHYAYA MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. PURNIMA SINGH RAJPOOT MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 19 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

JUDGMENT

  1. The present complaint has been filed by the complainant before this commission for  the following reliefs-

(a) The Op be directed to grant the electricity connection to the complainant.

(b) The op be directed to pay the amount Rs.15000/ as compensation for mental sufferings.

(c) The Op be directed to pay the expenses Rs.20000/ incurred by the complainant.

  1. The Complainant has stated that he had applied for electricity connection Online vide application no.100683636.He had also deposited the amount of estimate Rs.1338/ on 19.3.2020 but the connection was not granted. Complainant met with the chief Engineer and moved application in Grievance Redressal forum, Aligarh. He also moved application to Director Agra but no response.
  2.  Op submitted WS that the complainant had applied online electricity connection. Complainant had applied for granting domestic connection at the premises in Karthala but he made pressure for installation of the meter at different place which was disallowed by the line man.  
  3. Complainant has filed his affidavit and papers in support of his pleadings.  Op has also filed his affidavit and papers  in support of his pleadings
  4. We have perused the material available on record and heard the parties counsel.
  5. The first question of consideration before us is whether the complainant is entitled to any relief?
  6.  It is evident from perusal of the record that the complainant is the heir of Late Tula Ram in whose name electricity tube-well connection was granted and he has been making payment of the electricity charges. He has paid the electricity dues up to 31.3.2019 as per consumer ledger annexure 1. It reveals from ledger details that the complainant has paid Rs. 26536/ against the electricity dues Rs.26535.35 on 31.3.2009 and an amount of Rs.18237/ was due on 14.12.2021.On 15.12.2021 an amount of Rs. 171682/ including Rs. 15345/ has been shown. A letter dated 12.1.2022 (annexure2) sent by the office of the OP to the consumer in the name of Rajendra Singh contains  in Para 4 that  an amount of Rs. 18237/ was due against the tube-well connection for the period from 4/2019 to 2/2020. In the said letter it has been stated that on 20.10.2018 electricity theft was found on inspection of the connection for using chhaki and light and fan, though it has been refuted by the complainant, but an amount Rs.153445/ was added in the electricity bill out of  the revenue assessment at Rs. 562304/. There appears no reason to include the part of the assessment amount Rs. 562304/ whereas the total assessment amount should have been included in the electricity bill. This addition of a part of the total assessment amount raises doubts on total assessment at Rs. 562304/. Under the circumstances, at this stage the assessment amount is held to be Rs.153445/ which was added in the electricity bill. In view of section 154(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003,  the assessment made at Rs562304/ or Rs.153445/ shall be subject to the decision of special court in concluding the trial U/s 135 of the Electricity Act. Under the circumstances the liability of payment of the assessment amount may be deferred till the decision of special court and the complainant may be permitted to pay Rs. 18237/ as electricity dues against the said connection. Complainant is entitled for domestic connection on payment of the amount Rs.18237/ at his premises.           
  7.   The question formulated above is decided in favour of the complainant.
  8.   We hereby direct the op to grant the electricity domestic connection to the complainant after making payment of the amount Rs.18237/ as electricity dues against the electricity tube-well connection.
  9.  Op shall comply with the direction within a month failing which OP shall be prosecuted for non-compliance in accordance with section 72 of the Act for awarding punishment against him.
  10. A copy of this judgment be provided to all the parties as per rule as mandated by Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The judgment be uploaded forthwith on the website of the commission for the perusal of the parties.
  11. File be consigned to record room along with a copy of this judgment.
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. HASNAIN QURESHI]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. ALOK UPADHYAYA]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PURNIMA SINGH RAJPOOT]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.