Kerala

Kannur

CC/27/2018

Sushama.A.P - Complainant(s)

Versus

Eureka Forbes - Opp.Party(s)

20 Nov 2019

ORDER

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
KANNUR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/27/2018
( Date of Filing : 29 Jan 2018 )
 
1. Sushama.A.P
Sankeerthanam,P.O.Kakkad,Kannur-670005.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Eureka Forbes
R.T.Complex,Near Surya Silks,South Bazar,Kannur-670002.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Roy Paul PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Moly Kutty Mathew MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Sajeesh. K.P MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 20 Nov 2019
Final Order / Judgement

SMT.MOLYKUTTY MATHEW : MEMBER

       The complainant  has  filed this complaint  under sec.12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 seeking  direction against the opposite party  to provide proper  repair  and maintenance  service of the water purifier to the complainant and to pay compensation  for the deficiency  of service  on his part.

  The case of the complainant in brief.

      The complainant   is one of the  customer of opposite party's AMC water purifier.  The  complainant's customer code No.was 1009019495.  For the  last 15 years the complainant is using opposite party's service.  The complainant and  opposite party entered into  an agreement to purify the  water within 6 months, one time free service given to the complainant.  Thereafter he  extended the service to one year.  But now the service extended to 3 years and renewal the agreement also.  The additional maintenance  contracts was executed between the complainant and opposite party for the period of 29/11/2013 to 28/11/2016.  This period the opposite party has provided his service to the complainant as per the terms of the  contract. the complainant paid the service charge for Rs.3525/- through SBI account.  Thereafter on 21/1/2017 the  opposite party  has provided service to the  complainant.  But for the last one year,regarding service no reply from the side of opposite party.  So the water purifier system is not in good condition, the complainant cause mental agony  and hardship.  Alleging  the above said act amounts to deficiency  of service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party.  The complainant has filed the instant complaint.

        After filing the complaint notice was issued to   opposite party,  appeared before the Fora and filed his  version. It states that the complainant has not registered for further AMC after the expiry of AMC.  The opposite party is ready to provide their service, if the complainant is ready to register the same. There is no  cheating from the part of opposite party and no deficiency of service on his part and the complaint  may be dismissed.

     Accordingly  the complainant has  to produced her chief affidavit  in lieu of  her  chief examination and Exts.A1and  to A2 marked and  cross examined as PW1.  Ext.A1 clearly shows that the complainant had paid Rs.3525/- to the service charge of Eureka Farb'es and Ext.A2 is the service request  activity report.  Opposite party states that the  complainant is ready to register the AMC , the opposite party is  ready to  provide their service.

      In the result, we the Fora disposed the complaint  directing the opposite party to give paid service to  the complainant as per terms and  conditions of AMC.     This order to be complied by the  opposite party within  30 days of  receipt  of this order.  Failing which  the  complainant shall be  at liberty to  execute  the  order as  per the  provisions  of Consumer Protection Act 1986.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

Exts

A1 -Service contract receipt

A2- Service request activity report.

Sd/                                                            Sd/                                         Sd/

MEMBER                    MEMBER                                  PRESIDENT

eva                                      /Forwarded by Order/

                                         SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Roy Paul]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Moly Kutty Mathew]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sajeesh. K.P]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.