Kerala

Idukki

CC/288/2016

Dr.Sini P S - Complainant(s)

Versus

Eureka Forbes Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.Vikraman Nair

23 May 2017

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,
IDUKKI
 
Complaint Case No. CC/288/2016
 
1. Dr.Sini P S
Parappallil House,Nedumkandom
Idukki
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Eureka Forbes Ltd
YMCA cross Road Kozikodu 673001
2. Issac helth plus
6th Mile Kumily chakkupallam
Idukki
Kerala
3. Eureka Forbes Ltd Mumbai
Mumbai
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. S Gopakumar PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Benny K MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 23 May 2017
Final Order / Judgement

D.o.O:23/5/2017

                      IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMIDDUKKI

                                                                CC.NO.288/16

                                               Dated this, the 23rd day of May 2017

PRESENT:

 

SRI.S.GOPAKUMAR : PRESIDENT

SRI.BENNY.K.            : MEMBER

 

1.Dr.Sini.P.S, Parappallil House,

   Nedumkandam Po, East Junction,

   Nedumkandam.                                                                        :  Complainants

2. Sathyan.P.S, Parappallil House,

   Nedumkandam Po, East Junction,   Nedumkandam

Represented by Sathyan.P.S

(Adv.Vikraman Nair.N.G)

 

1 .Eureka Fobers Ltd , Twin Tower,1st &2nd Floor,

     YMCA cross Road, Behind IDBI Bank, Calicut-673001.

2. Isacs Health Plus, 6th Mile Kumily, Chakkupallam Po,                  : Opposite parties

3. Eureka Fobers Limited, B1/B2,701,7th Floor,

    Marathon Innova  Marathon Nextgen,

    Off ganpatrao Kadam marg,Lower Parel,Mumbai 4000013.

 

                                                                                         ORDER

SRI.BENNY.K .MEMBER.

   The complainant had purchased a Aqua guard water purifier from the 2nd opposite party , marketed by the ist opposite party for Rs.15490/-.  The 2nd opposite party installed the device and provided one year warranty for the product.  It become  defective  after 13 days  of purchase, the matter was informed to the  1st and 2nd opposite party.  While purchasing the product the opposite parties are assured that they will provide customer service on tele call within a day , but after registering the complaint.  After one week a person  come and inspected the device and he informed that the spare part is not available with him and it  has to come from Mumbai.  Thereafter  several times the complainant contacted  them, but till this date the defect of the device is not rectified by them.  Hence the complaint approach before the Forum for getting a  direction to replace the defective device with a new one or to pay the entire bill amount with interest and compensation.

2.   The point for consideration is whether there  is  any deficiency in service on the part of opposite party and if so  for what  relief  the complainant is entitled to ?

3.   The evidence consist only documentary Ext.P1 and P2 marked from the side of the  complainant.  No  oral and documentary evidence  adduced by the opposite parties.

4.   The Point:  The complainant had  purchased a Aqua guard water purifier from the 2nd opposite party marketed by the Ist opposite party.  2nd opposite party directly installed the purifier and collected  the bill amount of Rs.15490/- Ext.P1 and Users Manual  Ext.P2.  While purchasing the   same 1st opposite party issued a warranty for one year from the date of installation.  The purifier become defective after 13 days of the purchase itself.  On 2/5/2016   a complaint had registered   with the 1st & 2nd opposite party .  After   one week a person  came to the house for  service and after checking the product he informed that the spare parts is not available  with him and it as to  come from Mumbai.  He left without rectifying the defect.  There after several times the complainant contacted the opposite party.  But they are not ready to rectify the defects of the purifier in the warranty period itself .  Hence  the complaint  approached  before the Forum.

 Opposite parties 1 & 2 appeared before the Forum and  not filed any written version and  remain absent and no evidence adduced .  We the Forum  find that  after  selling the product and not  providing after sale service within the warranty period is a deficiency in service and unfair trade practice and for that  complainant is entitled for compensation.

     Hence the  petition   allowed.  The opposite parties 1& 2 are directed to replace the water purifier  and provide one year warranty  from the date of replacement for the same  or return the  price of the purifier  and also directed to  pay Rs.10,000/- as cost and compensation  to the complainant  within 30 days  from the date of receipt of copy of copy of this order , failing which opposite parties shall carry interest at 12% per  annum for the  said amount from the date of default till realization  .

    Pronounced in the open forum  on this  the   23rd    day of  May 2017 

                                                                                               Sd/

                                                                      SRI.BENNY.K             :MEMBER

Sd/

                                                                     SRI.S.GOPAKUMAR : PRESIDENT

Exts:

P1-Users Manual

P2-Bill Voucher

eva                                                                 /Forwarded by Order/

 

SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. S Gopakumar]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Benny K]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.